Trust Region Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Explicit Dual Ascent using Local Policy Updates
Anish Abhijit Diwan, Davide Tateo, Christopher Mower, Haitham Bou Ammar, Jan Peters, Oleg Arenz
Abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is typically formulated as maximizing entropy subject to matching the distribution of expert trajectories. Classical (dual-ascent) IRL guarantees monotonic performance improvement but requires fully solving an RL problem each iteration to compute dual gradients. More recent adversarial methods avoid this cost at the expense of stability and monotonic dual improvement, by directly optimizing the primal problem and using a discriminator to provide rewards. In this work, we bridge the gap between these approaches by enabling monotonic improvement of the reward function and policy without having to fully solve an RL problem at every iteration. Our key theoretical insight is that a trust-region-optimal policy for a reward function update can be globally optimal for a smaller update in the same direction. This smaller update allows us to explicitly optimize the dual objective while only relying on a local search around the current policy. In doing so, our approach avoids the training instabilities of adversarial methods, offers monotonic performance improvement, and learns a reward function in the traditional sense of IRL-one that can be globally optimized to match expert demonstrations. Our proposed algorithm, Trust Region Inverse Reinforcement Learning (TRIRL), outperforms state-of-the-art imitation learning methods across multiple challenging tasks by a factor of 2.4x in terms of aggregate inter-quartile mean, while recovering reward functions that generalize to system dynamics shifts. ‡ ‡ Code and supplementary material are available at: https://anishhdiwan.github.io/trust-region-irl/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on12
- AMP: adversarial motion priors for stylized physics-based character controlXue Bin Peng, Ze Ma, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey Levine et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 392 citations
- Efficient and Modular Implicit DifferentiationMathieu Blondel, Quentin Berthet, Marco Cuturi, Roy Frostig et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 386 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL ProblemsBenjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 244 citations
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution MatchingIlya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan TompsonICLR 2020 · 239 citations
Related papers
- Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization AlgorithmYang Chen, Menglin Zou, Jiaqi Zhang, Yitan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature MatchingArnav Kumar Jain, Harley Wiltzer, Jesse Farebrother, Irina Rish et al.ICLR 2025
- BC-IRL: Learning Generalizable Reward Functions from DemonstrationsAndrew Szot, Amy Zhang, Dhruv Batra, Zsolt Kira et al.ICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time GuaranteesSiliang Zeng, Chenliang Li, Alfredo García, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
- Distributionally Robust Imitation LearningMohammad Ali Bashiri, Brian D. Ziebart, Xinhua ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 13 citations
