Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization Algorithm
Yang Chen, Menglin Zou, Jiaqi Zhang, Yitan Zhang, Junyi Yang, Gaël Gendron, Libo Zhang, Jiamou Liu, Michael Witbrock
Abstract
Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) learns a reward function to explain expert demonstrations. Modern IRL methods often use the adversarial (minimax) formulation that alternates between reward and policy optimization, which often lead to unstable training. Recent non-adversarial IRL approaches improve stability by jointly learning reward and policy via energy-based formulations but lack formal guarantees. This work bridges this gap. We first present a unified view showing canonical non-adversarial methods explicitly or implicitly maximize the likelihood of expert behavior, which is equivalent to minimizing the expected return gap. This insight leads to our main contribution: Trust Region Reward Optimization (TRRO), a framework that guarantees monotonic improvement in this likelihood via a Minorization-Maximization process. We instantiate TRRO into Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization (PIRO), a practical and stable IRL algorithm. Theoretically, TRRO provides the IRL counterpart to the stability guarantees of Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) in forward RL. Empirically, PIRO matches or surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in reward recovery, policy imitation with high sample efficiency on MuJoCo and Gym-Robotics benchmarks and a real-world animal behavior modeling task. 1 * Title used at submission and review: PIRO: Toward Stable Reward Learning for Inverse RL via Monotonic Policy Divergence Reduction.
† Main contributors. Yang Chen developed the theorems, completed the proofs, wrote the paper, and implemented the initial version of the algorithm. Menglin Zou led the experimental evaluation. Jiaqi Zhang and Junyi Yang validated the algorithm using toy models. Yitan Zhang conducted the experiments on robotics and animal behavior modeling tasks. The remaining authors contributed through critical discussions and feedback.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3be2e1b5-1657-47be-b2ea-e8f189d891bbBuilds on15
- SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse RewardsSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution MatchingIlya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan TompsonICLR 2020 · 239 citations
- Of Moments and Matching: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Closing the Imitation GapGokul Swamy, Sanjiban Choudhury, J. Andrew Bagnell, Steven WuICML 2021 · 90 citations
- Mitigating Covariate Shift in Imitation Learning via Offline Data With Partial CoverageJonathan D. Chang, Masatoshi Uehara, Dhruv Sreenivas, Rahul Kidambi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Trust Region Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Explicit Dual Ascent using Local Policy UpdatesAnish Abhijit Diwan, Davide Tateo, Christopher Mower, Haitham Bou Ammar et al.ICML 2026
- Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient AlgorithmsFilippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature MatchingArnav Kumar Jain, Harley Wiltzer, Jesse Farebrother, Irina Rish et al.ICLR 2025
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation LearningDaniel S. Brown, Scott Niekum, Marek PetrikNeurIPS 2020 · 43 citations
