Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithms
Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli
Abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover the reward function of an expert agent from demonstrations of behavior. It is well-known that the IRL problem is fundamentally ill-posed, i.e., many reward functions can explain the demonstrations. For this reason, IRL has been recently reframed in terms of estimating the feasible reward set (Metelli et al., 2021) , thus, postponing the selection of a single reward. However, so far, the available formulations and algorithmic solutions have been proposed and analyzed mainly for the online setting, where the learner can interact with the environment and query the expert at will. This is clearly unrealistic in most practical applications, where the availability of an offline dataset is a much more common scenario. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion of feasible reward set capturing the opportunities and limitations of the offline setting and we analyze the complexity of its estimation. This requires the introduction of an original learning framework that copes with the intrinsic difficulty of the setting, for which the data coverage is not under control. Then, we propose two computationally and statistically efficient algorithms, IRLO and PIRLO, for addressing the problem. In particular, the latter adopts a specific form of pessimism to enforce the novel, desirable property of inclusion monotonicity of the delivered feasible set. With this work, we aim to provide a panorama of the challenges of the offline IRL problem and how they can be fruitfully addressed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- How does Inverse RL Scale to Large State Spaces? A Provably Efficient ApproachFilippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria MetelliNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- On Feasible Rewards in Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement LearningTill Freihaut, Giorgia RamponiNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Imitation Learning as Return Distribution MatchingFilippo Lazzati, Alberto Maria MetelliICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Learning Utilities from Demonstrations in Markov Decision ProcessesFilippo Lazzati, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2025
- Fast Mixing Steady-State Control in Markov Decision ProcessesFederico Corso, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2026
Builds on12
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
Related papers
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement LearningRiccardo Poiani, Gabriele Curti, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and FeedbackKihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman E. Ozdaglar, Pablo A. ParriloICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Filippo Lazzati, Marcello RestelliICML 2023 · 21 citations
- When Demonstrations meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement LearningSiliang Zeng, Chenliang Li, Alfredo García, Mingyi HongNeurIPS 2023 · 33 citations
