Imitation Learning as Return Distribution Matching
Filippo Lazzati, Alberto Maria Metelli
Abstract
We study the problem of training a risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) agent through imitation learning (IL). Unlike standard IL, our goal is not only to train an agent that matches the expert's expected return (i.e., its average performance) but also its risk attitude (i.e., other features of the return distribution, such as variance). We propose a general formulation of the risk-sensitive IL problem in which the objective is to match the expert's return distribution in Wasserstein distance. We focus on the tabular setting and assume the expert's reward is known. After demonstrating the limited expressivity of Markovian policies for this task, we introduce an efficient and sufficiently expressive subclass of non-Markovian policies tailored to it. Building on this subclass, we develop two provably efficient algorithms-RS-BC and RS-KT -for solving the problem when the transition model is unknown and known, respectively. We show that RS-KT achieves substantially lower sample complexity than RS-BC by exploiting dynamics information. We further demonstrate the sample efficiency of return distribution matching in the setting where the expert's reward is unknown by designing an oracle-based variant of RS-KT. Finally, we complement our theoretical analysis of RS-KT and RS-BC with numerical simulations, highlighting both their sample efficiency and the advantages of non-Markovian policies over standard sample-efficient IL algorithms. INTRODUCTION Imitation Learning (IL) (Abbeel & Ng, 2004; Osa et al., 2018) is the problem of training an agent to behave by mimicking demonstrations from an expert. By removing the need for designing a reward function for the task-which is often a difficult challenge (Hadfield-Menell et al., 2017) -IL has been successfully applied in diverse domains, including robotics (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c912365d-0457-438b-883d-6b50d00b8a55Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse RewardsSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
- Toward the Fundamental Limits of Imitation LearningNived Rajaraman, Lin F. Yang, Jiantao Jiao, Kannan RamchandranNeurIPS 2020 · 137 citations
- Disagreement-Regularized Imitation LearningKianté Brantley, Wen Sun, Mikael HenaffICLR 2020 · 112 citations
Related papers
- Variational Adversarial Kernel Learned Imitation LearningFan Yang, Alina Vereshchaka, Yufan Zhou, Changyou Chen et al.AAAI 2020 · 9 citations
- Primal Wasserstein Imitation LearningRobert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot, Matthieu Geist, Olivier PietquinICLR 2021 · 41 citations
- Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in RegretYingjie Fei, Zhuoran Yang, Yudong Chen, Zhaoran Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 87 citations
- Planning for Sample Efficient Imitation LearningZhao-Heng Yin, Weirui Ye, Qifeng Chen, Yang GaoNeurIPS 2022 · 32 citations
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution MatchingIlya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan TompsonICLR 2020 · 239 citations
