On Feasible Rewards in Multi-Agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Till Freihaut, Giorgia Ramponi
Abstract
Multi-agent Inverse Reinforcement Learning (MAIRL) aims to recover agent reward functions from expert demonstrations. We characterize the feasible reward set in Markov games, identifying all reward functions that rationalize a given equilibrium. However, equilibrium-based observations are often ambiguous: a single Nash equilibrium can correspond to many reward structures, potentially changing the game's nature in multi-agent systems. We address this by introducing entropyregularized Markov games, which yield a unique equilibrium while preserving strategic incentives. For this setting, we provide a sample complexity analysis detailing how errors affect learned policy performance. Our work establishes theoretical foundations and practical insights for MAIRL.
We present the essential background and notation used throughout this paper, also summarized in Appendix A.
Let X be a finite set, then we denote by R X all functions mapping from X to R. Additionally, we denote by ∆ X the set of probability measures over X . For n ∈ N we use [n] := 1, . . . , n. We introduce for a (pre)metric space (X , d) with Y, Y ′ ⊆ X
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Matching Multiple Experts: On the Exploitability of Multi-Agent Imitation LearningAntoine Bergerault, Volkan Cevher, Negar MehrICLR 2026
- Improving Zero-Shot Offline RL via Behavioral Task SamplingNazim Bendib, Nicolas Perrin-Gilbert, Olivier SigaudICML 2026
Builds on19
- Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent AutocurriculaBowen Baker, Ingmar Kanitscheider, Todor M. Markov, Yi Wu et al.ICLR 2020 · 751 citations
- Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample ComplexityKaiqing Zhang, Sham M. Kakade, Tamer Basar, Lin F. YangNeurIPS 2020 · 144 citations
- Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningHaoyang Cao, Samuel N. Cohen, Lukasz SzpruchNeurIPS 2021 · 72 citations
- Pessimistic Minimax Value Iteration: Provably Efficient Equilibrium Learning from Offline DatasetsHan Zhong, Wei Xiong, Jiyuan Tan, Liwei Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 46 citations
- Reward Identification in Inverse Reinforcement LearningKuno Kim, Shivam Garg, Kirankumar Shiragur, Stefano ErmonICML 2021 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Decoding Rewards in Competitive Games: Inverse Game Theory with Entropy RegularizationJunyi Liao, Zihan Zhu, Ethan X. Fang, Zhuoran Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Data Poisoning to Fake a Nash Equilibria for Markov GamesYoung Wu, Jeremy McMahan, Xiaojin Zhu, Qiaomin XieAAAI 2024 · 6 citations
- Optimal Rates for Feasible Payoff Set Estimation in GamesAnnalisa Barbara, Riccardo Poiani, Martino Bernasconi, Andrea CelliICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDexter R. R. Scobee, S. Shankar SastryICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement LearningRiccardo Poiani, Gabriele Curti, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
