Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature Matching
Arnav Kumar Jain, Harley Wiltzer, Jesse Farebrother, Irina Rish, Glen Berseth, Sanjiban Choudhury
Abstract
In inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), an agent seeks to replicate expert demonstrations through interactions with the environment. Traditionally, IRL is treated as an adversarial game, where an adversary searches over reward models, and a learner optimizes the reward through repeated RL procedures. This game-solving approach is both computationally expensive and difficult to stabilize. In this work, we propose a novel approach to IRL by direct policy search: by exploiting a linear factorization of the return as the inner product of successor features and a reward vector, we design an IRL algorithm by policy gradient descent on the gap between the learner and expert features. Our non-adversarial method does not require learning an explicit reward function and can be solved seamlessly with existing RL algorithms. Remarkably, our approach works in state-only settings without expert action labels, a setting which behavior cloning (BC) cannot solve. Empirical results demonstrate that our method learns from as few as a single expert demonstration and achieves improved performance on various control tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eca29240-e820-43fa-bd55-492e89b460a7Cited by top-tier papers5
- A Smooth Sea Never Made a Skilled SAILOR: Robust Imitation via Learning to SearchArnav Kumar Jain, Vibhakar Mohta, Subin Kim, Atiksh Bhardwaj et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Trust Region Reward Optimization and Proximal Inverse Reward Optimization AlgorithmYang Chen, Menglin Zou, Jiaqi Zhang, Yitan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- On Discovering Algorithms for Adversarial Imitation LearningShashank Reddy Chirra, Jayden Teoh, Praveen Paruchuri, Pradeep VarakanthamICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Temporal Difference FlowsJesse Farebrother, Matteo Pirotta, Andrea Tirinzoni, Rémi Munos et al.ICML 2025
- Trust Region Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Explicit Dual Ascent using Local Policy UpdatesAnish Abhijit Diwan, Davide Tateo, Christopher Mower, Haitham Bou Ammar et al.ICML 2026
Builds on25
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Count-Based Exploration with the Successor RepresentationMarlos C. Machado, Marc G. Bellemare, Michael BowlingAAAI 2020 · 206 citations
Related papers
- Active Exploration for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDavid Lindner, Andreas Krause, Giorgia RamponiNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal GuaranteesGregory Dexter, Kevin Bello, Jean HonorioNeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning with the Average Reward CriterionFeiyang Wu, Jingyang Ke, Anqi WuNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Hybrid Inverse Reinforcement LearningJuntao Ren, Gokul Swamy, Steven Wu, Drew Bagnell et al.ICML 2024 · 33 citations
