Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically Matched Paraphrases
Dustin Wright, Jiaxin Pei, David Jurgens, Isabelle Augenstein
Abstract
Whether the media faithfully communicate scientific information has long been a core issue to the science community. Automatically identifying paraphrased scientific findings could enable large-scale tracking and analysis of information changes in the science communication process, but this requires systems to understand the similarity between scientific information across multiple domains. To this end, we present the SCIENTIFIC PARAPHRASE AND INFOR-MATION CHANGE DATASET (SPICED), the first paraphrase dataset of scientific findings annotated for degree of information change. SPICED contains 6,000 scientific finding pairs extracted from news stories, social media discussions, and full texts of original papers. We demonstrate that SPICED poses a challenging task and that models trained on SPICED improve downstream performance on evidence retrieval for fact checking of real-world scientific claims. Finally, we show that models trained on SPICED can reveal large-scale trends in the degrees to which people and organizations faithfully communicate new scientific findings. Data, code, and pre-trained models are available at http://www.copenlu.com/publication/ 2022_emnlp_wright/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c04a5013-e8d3-4b53-b367-608eded23935Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Understanding Factual Knowledge of Large Language ModelsXuming Hu, Junzhe Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Yufei Guo et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- Missci: Reconstructing Fallacies in Misrepresented ScienceMax Glockner, Yufang Hou, Preslav Nakov, Iryna GurevychACL 2024 · 1 citation
- InfoLossQA: Characterizing and Recovering Information Loss in Text SimplificationJan Trienes, Sebastian Joseph, Jörg Schlötterer, Christin Seifert et al.ACL 2024
- The Noisy Path from Source to Citation: Measuring How Scholars Engage with Past ResearchHong Chen, Misha Teplitskiy, David JurgensACL 2025
Builds on14
- MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained TransformersWenhui Wang, Furu Wei, Li Dong, Hangbo Bao et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,727 citations
- MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language UnderstandingKaitao Song, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Jianfeng Lu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,957 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research CorpusKyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Mark Neumann, Rodney Kinney et al.ACL 2020 · 424 citations
- What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on TwitterKaty Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, Sarah Huang, Jennifer Lee et al.CSCW 2021 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Countering Misinformation via Emotional Response GenerationDaniel Russo, Shane P. Kaszefski-Yaschuk, Jacopo Staiano, Marco GueriniEMNLP 2023 · 4 citations
- WatClaimCheck: A new Dataset for Claim Entailment and InferenceKashif Khan, Ruizhe Wang, Pascal PoupartACL 2022
- Metaphor Understanding Challenge Dataset for LLMsXiaoyu Tong, Rochelle Choenni, Martha Lewis, Ekaterina ShutovaACL 2024
- We Can Explain Your Research in Layman's Terms: Towards Automating Science Journalism at ScaleRumen Dangovski, Michelle Shen, Dawson Byrd, Li Jing et al.AAAI 2021 · 12 citations
- 'Don't Get Too Technical with Me': A Discourse Structure-Based Framework for Automatic Science JournalismRonald Cardenas, Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang, Yufang HouEMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
