What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on Twitter
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, Sarah Huang, Jennifer Lee, Lydia B. Chilton
Abstract
People are increasingly getting information and news from social media. On Twitter we are seeing the emergence of "tweetorials" -- long, explanatory Twitter threads written by experts. In this work we study tweetorials as a form of science writing. While scientists have begun to champion the importance of Twitter as a science communication medium, few have studied how people are successfully using this medium to communicate complex and nuanced ideas. To understand how tweetorials work, we curated a collection of 46 clear and engaging tweetorials from multiple domains. We analyzed these tweetorials for the writing techniques that they employ, and found that while tweetorials use many traditional science writing techniques, they also use more subjective language, actively build credibility, and incorporate media in unique ways. In addition, we report on a workshop we ran to aid science PhD students in writing tweetorials, and find that while providing common tweetorial techniques improves their writing, the students still struggle to balance their scientific sensibilities with the informal tone associated with tweetorials. We discuss the implications of using informal and subjective language in science communication, as well as how technology can support scientists in writing tweetorials.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext afe7aae4-9821-4d32-b79f-c14fbea4a6acCited by top-tier papers8
- PopBlends: Strategies for Conceptual Blending with Large Language ModelsSitong Wang, Savvas Petridis, Taeahn Kwon, Xiaojuan Ma et al.CHI 2023 · 57 citations
- Understanding Communication Strategies and Viewer Engagement with Science Knowledge Videos on BilibiliYu Zhang, Changyang He, Huanchen Wang, Zhicong LuCHI 2023 · 25 citations
- An HCI Research Agenda for Online Science CommunicationSpencer Williams, Ridley Jones, Katharina Reinecke, Gary HsiehCSCW 2022 · 15 citations
- Engage Wider Audience or Facilitate Quality Answers? a Mixed-methods Analysis of Questioning Strategies for Research Sensemaking on a Community Q&A SiteChangyang He, Yue Deng, Lu He, Qingyu Guo et al.CSCW 2024 · 7 citations
- Writing out the Storm: Designing and Evaluating Tools for Weather Risk MessagingSophia S. Jit, Jennifer Spinney, Priyank Chandra, Lydia B. Chilton et al.CHI 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- "I run the world's largest historical outreach project and it's on a cesspool of a website." Moderating a Public Scholarship Site on Reddit: A Case Study of r/AskHistoriansSarah A. GilbertCSCW 2020 · 79 citations
- Explain like I am a Scientist: The Linguistic Barriers of Entry to r/scienceTal August, Dallas Card, Gary Hsieh, Noah A. Smith et al.CHI 2020 · 22 citations
Related papers
- The Unwanted Dissemination of Science: The Usage of Academic Articles as Ammunition in Contested Discursive Arenas on TwitterRichard Zhang, Emoke-Ágnes HorvátCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- Writing Strategies for Science Communication: Data and Computational AnalysisTal August, Lauren Kim, Katharina Reinecke, Noah A. SmithEMNLP 2020 · 22 citations
- Foundations for Enabling People to Recognise Misinformation in Social Media News based on Retracted ScienceWaheeb Yaqub, Judy Kay, Micah B. GoldwaterCSCW 2024 · 7 citations
- Alt-Text with Context: Improving Accessibility for Images on TwitterNikita Srivatsan, Sofía Samaniego, Omar Florez, Taylor Berg-KirkpatrickICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- "This Is Damn Slick!" Estimating the Impact of Tweets on Open Source Project Popularity and New ContributorsHongbo Fang, Hemank Lamba, James D. Herbsleb, Bogdan VasilescuICSE 2022 · 18 citations
