Towards Understanding Factual Knowledge of Large Language Models
Xuming Hu, Junzhe Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Yufei Guo, Lijie Wen, Philip S. Yu, Zhijiang Guo
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently driven striking performance improvements across a range of natural language processing tasks. The factual knowledge acquired during pretraining and instruction tuning can be useful in various downstream tasks, such as question answering, and language generation. Unlike conventional Knowledge Bases (KBs) that explicitly store factual knowledge, LLMs implicitly store facts in their parameters. Content generated by the LLMs can often exhibit inaccuracies or deviations from the truth, due to facts that can be incorrectly induced or become obsolete over time. To this end, we aim to explore the extent and scope of factual knowledge within LLMs by designing the benchmark Pinocchio. Pinocchio contains 20K diverse factual questions that span different sources, timelines, domains, regions, and languages. Furthermore, we investigate whether LLMs can compose multiple facts, update factual knowledge temporally, reason over multiple pieces of facts, identify subtle factual differences, and resist adversarial examples. Extensive experiments on different sizes and types of LLMs show that existing LLMs still lack factual knowledge and suffer from various spurious correlations. We believe this is a critical bottleneck for realizing trustworthy artificial intelligence. The dataset Pinocchio and our codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/THU-BPM/Pinocchio.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 63ab04ce-e280-4fba-8236-4790c476ac40Cited by top-tier papers12
- Perception of Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models through Semi-open-ended Question AnsweringZhihua Wen, Zhiliang Tian, Zexin Jian, Zhen Huang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- Language Models Can Predict Their Own BehaviorDhananjay Ashok, Jonathan MayNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- EvolveBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Temporal Awareness in LLMs on Evolving KnowledgeZhiyuan Zhu, Yusheng Liao, Zhe Chen, Yuhao Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- Tracing and Reversing Edits in LLMsPaul Youssef, Zhixue Zhao, Christin Seifert, Jörg SchlöttererICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- ACE: Attribution-Controlled Knowledge Editing for Multi-hop Factual RecallJiayu Yang, Yuxuan Fan, Songning Lai, Shengen Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on54
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- Transferable and Efficient Non-Factual Content Detection via Probe Training with Offline Consistency CheckingXiaokang Zhang, Zijun Yao, Jing Zhang, Kaifeng Yun et al.ACL 2024
- How Do Large Language Models Acquire Factual Knowledge During Pretraining?Hoyeon Chang, Jinho Park, Seonghyeon Ye, Sohee Yang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- Can Knowledge Editing Really Correct Hallucinations?Baixiang Huang, Canyu Chen, Xiongxiao Xu, Ali Payani et al.ICLR 2025
- Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language ModelsJirui Qi, Raquel Fernández, Arianna BisazzaEMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- Are the Hidden States Hiding Something? Testing the Limits of Factuality-Encoding Capabilities in LLMsGiovanni Servedio, Alessandro De Bellis, Dario Di Palma, Vito Walter Anelli et al.ACL 2025 · 9 citations
