Transferable and Efficient Non-Factual Content Detection via Probe Training with Offline Consistency Checking
Xiaokang Zhang, Zijun Yao, Jing Zhang, Kaifeng Yun, Jifan Yu, Juanzi Li, Jie Tang
Abstract
Detecting non-factual content is a longstanding goal to increase the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs) generations. Current factuality probes, trained using humanannotated labels, exhibit limited transferability to out-of-distribution content, while online selfconsistency checking imposes extensive computation burden due to the necessity of generating multiple outputs. This paper proposes PINOSE, which trains a probing model on offline self-consistency checking results, thereby circumventing the need for human-annotated data and achieving transferability across diverse data distributions. As the consistency check process is offline, PINOSE reduces the computational burden of generating multiple responses by online consistency verification. Additionally, it examines various aspects of internal states prior to response decoding, contributing to more effective detection of factual inaccuracies. Experiment results on both factuality detection and question answering benchmarks show that PINOSE achieves surpassing results than existing factuality detection methods. Our code and datasets are publicly available on this github repository.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2152c211-0103-423a-b2e2-df22ba16cae0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Dynamic Scaling of Unit Tests for Code Reward ModelingZeyao Ma, Xiaokang Zhang, Jing Zhang, Jifan Yu et al.ACL 2025 · 21 citations
- Are the Hidden States Hiding Something? Testing the Limits of Factuality-Encoding Capabilities in LLMsGiovanni Servedio, Alessandro De Bellis, Dario Di Palma, Vito Walter Anelli et al.ACL 2025 · 9 citations
- SeaKR: Self-aware Knowledge Retrieval for Adaptive Retrieval Augmented GenerationZijun Yao, Weijian Qi, Liangming Pan, Shulin Cao et al.ACL 2025
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- Language Models Represent Space and TimeWes Gurnee, Max TegmarkICLR 2024 · 303 citations
Related papers
- Towards Understanding Factual Knowledge of Large Language ModelsXuming Hu, Junzhe Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Yufei Guo et al.ICLR 2024 · 21 citations
- FacLens: Transferable Probe for Foreseeing Non-Factuality in Fact-Seeking Question Answering of Large Language ModelsYanling Wang, Haoyang Li, Hao Zou, Jing Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current EstimatorsMatéo Mahaut, Laura Aina, Paula Czarnowska, Momchil Hardalov et al.ACL 2024 · 7 citations
- Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language ModelsJirui Qi, Raquel Fernández, Arianna BisazzaEMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- SummEdits: Measuring LLM Ability at Factual Reasoning Through The Lens of SummarizationPhilippe Laban, Wojciech Kryscinski, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri et al.EMNLP 2023 · 29 citations
