DCR: Quantifying Data Contamination in LLMs Evaluation
Cheng Xu, Nan Yan, Shuhao Guan, Changhong Jin, Yuke Mei, Yibing Guo, M. Tahar Kechadi
Abstract
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has heightened concerns about benchmark data contamination (BDC), where models inadvertently memorize evaluation data during the training process, inflating performance metrics, and undermining genuine generalization assessment. This paper introduces the Data Contamination Risk (DCR 1 ) framework, a lightweight, interpretable pipeline designed to detect and quantify BDC risk across four granular levels: semantic, informational, data, and label. By synthesizing contamination scores via a fuzzy inference system, DCR produces a unified DCR Factor that adjusts raw accuracy to reflect contamination-aware performance. Validated on 9 LLMs (0.5B-72B) across sentiment analysis, fake news detection, and arithmetic reasoning tasks, the DCR framework reliably diagnoses contamination severity and with accuracy adjusted using the DCR Factor to within 4% average error across the three benchmarks compared to the uncontaminated baseline. Emphasizing computational efficiency and transparency, DCR provides a practical tool for integrating contamination assessment into routine evaluations, fostering fairer comparisons and enhancing the credibility of LLM benchmarking practices.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc38946c-fae5-467f-8d45-0b870d6bfa8cCited by top-tier papers3
- SSA: Semantic Contamination of LLM-Driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Nan Yan, Shuhao Guan, Yuke Mei et al.EMNLP 2025
- A Narrowing Geometry in Contaminated ReasoningJiakuan Xie, Pengfei Cao, Kang Liu, Jun ZhaoICML 2026
- LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Changhong Jin, Yingjie Niu, Nan Yan et al.ACL 2026
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, Colin RaffelICML 2022 · 395 citations
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language ModelsShahriar Golchin, Mihai SurdeanuICLR 2024 · 165 citations
Related papers
- TripleFact: Defending Data Contamination in the Evaluation of LLM-driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Nan YanACL 2025
- The Emperor's New Clothes in Benchmarking? A Rigorous Examination of Mitigation Strategies for LLM Benchmark Data ContaminationYifan Sun, Han Wang, Dongbai Li, Gang Wang et al.ICML 2025
- Controllable Contamination Detection for Reliable LLM Evaluation with Statistical GuaranteesZheng Zhang, Qi Liu, Siyuan Liang, Ning Li et al.ACL 2026
- ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language ModelsJasper Dekoninck, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2024 · 40 citations
- LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language ModelsMing Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang et al.ACL 2026
