LiveFact: A Dynamic, Time-Aware Benchmark for LLM-Driven Fake News Detection
Cheng Xu, Changhong Jin, Yingjie Niu, Nan Yan, Yuke Mei, Shuhao Guan, Liming Chen, M. Tahar Kechadi
Abstract
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed fake news detection and fact-checking tasks from simple classification to complex reasoning. However, evaluation frameworks have not kept pace. Current benchmarks are static, making them vulnerable to benchmark data contamination (BDC) and ineffective at assessing reasoning under temporal uncertainty. To address this, we introduce LiveFact 1 a continuously updated benchmark that simulates the real-world "fog of war" in misinformation detection. LiveFact uses dynamic, temporal evidence sets to evaluate models on their ability to reason with evolving, incomplete information rather than on memorized knowledge. We propose a dual-mode evaluation: Classification Mode for final verification and Inference Mode for evidence-based reasoning, along with a component to monitor BDC explicitly. Tests with 22 LLMs show that open-source Mixture-of-Experts models, such as Qwen3-235B-A22B, now match or outperform proprietary state-of-the-art systems. More importantly, our analysis finds a significant "reasoning gap." Capable models exhibit epistemic humility by recognizing unverifiable claims in early data slices-an aspect traditional static benchmarks overlook. LiveFact sets a sustainable standard for evaluating robust, temporally aware AI verification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa020171-a4fd-4dfb-bdcc-00178beef1aaBuilds on17
- Generating Fact Checking ExplanationsPepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle AugensteinACL 2020 · 130 citations
- GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local RefinementsAlexander Havrilla, Sharath Chandra Raparthy, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jane Dwivedi-Yu et al.ICML 2024 · 105 citations
- Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMsOded Ovadia, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren ElishaEMNLP 2024 · 89 citations
- Propagation Structure-Aware Graph Transformer for Robust and Interpretable Fake News DetectionJunyou Zhu, Chao Gao, Ze Yin, Xianghua Li et al.KDD 2024 · 37 citations
- Causal Walk: Debiasing Multi-Hop Fact Verification with Front-Door AdjustmentCongzhi Zhang, Linhai Zhang, Deyu ZhouAAAI 2024 · 32 citations
Related papers
- TripleFact: Defending Data Contamination in the Evaluation of LLM-driven Fake News DetectionCheng Xu, Nan YanACL 2025
- VeriTaS: The First Dynamic Benchmark for Multimodal Automated Fact-CheckingMark Rothermel, Marcus Kornmann, Marcus Rohrbach, Anna RohrbachACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Real-time Factuality Assessment from Adversarial FeedbackSanxing Chen, Yukun Huang, Bhuwan DhingraACL 2025
- INFACT: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Induced Faithfulness and Factuality Hallucinations in Video-LLMsJunqi Yang, Yuecong Min, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- ClaimDB: A Fact Verification Benchmark over Large Structured DataMichael Theologitis, Preetam Prabhu Srikar Dammu, Chirag Shah, Dan SuciuACL 2026 · 2 citations
