ACL Findings2025
AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents
Guhong Chen, Liyang Fan, Zihan Gong, Nan Xie, Zixuan Li, Ziqiang Liu, Chengming Li, Qiang Qu, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Shiwen Ni, Min Yang
Abstract
Current research in LLM-based simulation systems lacks comprehensive solutions for modeling real-world court proceedings, while existing legal language models struggle with dynamic courtroom interactions. We present AgentCourt, a comprehensive legal simulation framework that addresses these challenges through adversarial evolution of LLM-based agents. Our AgentCourt introduces a new adversarial evolutionary approach for agents called AdvEvol, which performs dynamic knowledge learning and evolution through structured adversarial interactions in a simulated courtroom program, breaking the limitations of the traditional reliance on static knowledge bases or manual annotations. By simulating 1,000 civil cases, we construct an evolving knowledge base that enhances the agents' legal reasoning abilities. The evolved lawyer agents demonstrated outstanding performance on our newly introduced Court-Bench benchmark, achieving a 12.1% improvement in performance compared to the original lawyer agents. Evaluations by professional lawyers confirm the effectiveness of our approach across three critical dimensions: cognitive agility, professional knowledge, and logical rigor. Beyond outperforming specialized legal models in interactive reasoning tasks, our findings emphasize the importance of adversarial learning in legal AI and suggest promising directions for extending simulation-based legal reasoning to broader judicial and regulatory contexts 1 .
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 5 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Ready Jurist One: Benchmarking Language Agents for Legal Intelligence in Dynamic EnvironmentsZheng Jia, Shengbin Yue, Wei Chen, Siyuan Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 12 citations
- XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI CollaborationNuo Chen, Andre Huikai Lin, Jiaying Wu, Junyi Hou et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and ChallengesShuang Liu, Ruijia Zhang, Ruoyun Ma, Yujia Deng et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- CyberJurors: A Multi-Agent Simulation Task for E-Commerce Disputes VerdictYanhui Sun, Wu Liu, Haifeng Ming, Xinru Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- VideoAutoArena: An Automated Arena for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Video Analysis through User SimulationZiyang Luo, Haoning Wu, Dongxu Li, Jing Ma et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on5
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language ModelsZhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 59 citations
- Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model CollaborationYiquan Wu, Siying Zhou, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 37 citations
- Embodied Multi-Modal Agent trained by an LLM from a Parallel TextWorldYijun Yang, Tianyi Zhou, Kanxue Li, Dapeng Tao et al.CVPR 2024 · 23 citations
- Agent Lumos: Unified and Modular Training for Open-Source Language AgentsDa Yin, Faeze Brahman, Abhilasha Ravichander, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu et al.ACL 2024
Related papers
- AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge AugmentationZhitao He, Pengfei Cao, Chenhao Wang, Zhuoran Jin et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 20 citations
- LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal DomainHaitao Li, Junjie Chen, Jingli Yang, Qingyao Ai et al.ACL 2025
- Law in Silico: Simulating Legal Society with LLM-Based AgentsYiding Wang, Yuxuan Chen, Fanxu Meng, Xifan Chen et al.ACL Findings 2026
- PLAWBENCH: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal PracticeYuzhen Shi, Huanghai Liu, Yiran Hu, Gaojie Song et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?Zhanke Zhou, Xiao Feng, Zhaocheng Zhu, Jiangchao Yao et al.ICML 2025
