LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges
Shuang Liu, Ruijia Zhang, Ruoyun Ma, Yujia Deng, Lanyi Zhu, Jiayu Li, Zelong Li, Zhibin Shen, Mengnan Du
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have precipitated a dramatic improvement in the legal domain, yet the deployment of standalone models faces significant limitations regarding hallucination, outdated information, and verifiability. Recently, LLM agents have attracted significant attention as a solution to these challenges, utilizing advanced capabilities such as planning, memory, and tool usage to meet the rigorous standards of legal practice. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of LLM agents for legal tasks, analyzing how these architectures bridge the gap between technical capabilities and domain-specific needs. Our major contributions include: (1) systematically analyzing the technical transition from standard legal LLMs to legal agents; (2) presenting a structured taxonomy of current agent applications across distinct legal practice areas; (3) discussing evaluation methodologies specifically for agentic performance in law; and (4) identifying open challenges and outlining future directions for developing robust and autonomous legal assistants.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e0149ec0-8789-4bb6-9525-619d9d5eccd2Builds on14
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- FinCon: A Synthesized LLM Multi-Agent System with Conceptual Verbal Reinforcement for Enhanced Financial Decision MakingYangyang Yu, Zhiyuan Yao, Haohang Li, Zhiyang Deng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 197 citations
- LLM-Check: Investigating Detection of Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsGaurang Sriramanan, Siddhant Bharti, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Shoumik Saha et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 170 citations
- Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM AgentsGiorgio Piatti, Zhijing Jin, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 151 citations
Related papers
- Speaker Verification in Agent-generated ConversationsYizhe Yang, Palakorn Achananuparp, Heyan Huang, Jing Jiang et al.ACL 2024
- A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Search AgentsYunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Yongzhao Xiao, Zheli Zhou et al.ACL 2026 · 1,216 citations
- Factuality of Large Language Models: A SurveyYuxia Wang, Minghan Wang, Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Fei Liu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 23 citations
- Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM AgentWeizhou Shen, Chenliang Li, Hongzhan Chen, Ming Yan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 18 citations
- From Capabilities to Performance: Evaluating Key Functional Properties of LLM Architectures in Penetration TestingLanxiao Huang, Daksh Dave, Tyler Cody, Peter A. Beling et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
