Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration
Yiquan Wu, Siying Zhou, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Xiaozhong Liu, Yating Zhang, Changlong Sun, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang
Abstract
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI, i.e., predicting the judgment of the case in terms of case fact description. Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems. Thus, it is worthwhile to explore the utilization of precedents in the LJP. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task. These can be broken down into two categories: large language models (LLMs) and domain-specific models. LLMs are capable of interpreting and generating complex natural language, while domain models are efficient in learning task-specific information. In this paper, we propose the precedent-enhanced LJP framework (PLJP) -a system that leverages the strength of both LLM and domain models in the context of precedents. Specifically, the domain models are designed to provide candidate labels and find the proper precedents efficiently, and the large models will make the final prediction with an in-context precedents comprehension. Experiments on the real-world dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our PLJP. Moreover, our work shows a promising direction for LLM and domain-model collaboration that can be generalized to other vertical domains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0fd362be-77bf-4efa-8c1f-2b531c3b2960Cited by top-tier papers6
- Intelligent Model Update Strategy for Sequential RecommendationZheqi Lv, Wenqiao Zhang, Zhengyu Chen, Shengyu Zhang et al.WWW 2024 · 53 citations
- GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment PredictionXinyu Yang, Chenlong Deng, Zhicheng DouACL 2026 · 5 citations
- ZipLJP: Zipped Information Processor for Legal Judgment PredictionFanghao Lou, Qiqi Wang, Guanyu Chen, Kaiqi Zhao et al.AAAI 2026
- LegalChainReasoner: Grounding Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation via Structured Legal ChainsWeizhe Shi, Qiqi Wang, Yihong Pan, Qian Liu et al.ACL 2026
- Pub-LawBench: Public-Oriented Benchmarking for LegalAIQiaoyu Zheng, Zehan Ma, Yijing Zhang, Qiqi Wang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial IntelligenceHaoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.ACL 2020 · 316 citations
- Guiding Pretraining in Reinforcement Learning with Large Language ModelsYuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Zihan Wang, Cédric Colas et al.ICML 2023 · 257 citations
- Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment PredictionNuo Xu, Pinghui Wang, Long Chen, Li Pan et al.ACL 2020 · 150 citations
- NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment PredictionLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Binbin Jin, Han Wu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 83 citations
Related papers
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
- Legal Fact Prediction: The Missing Piece in Legal Judgment PredictionJunkai Liu, Yujie Tong, Hui Huang, Bowen Zheng et al.EMNLP 2025
- Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural NetworksLeilei Gan, Kun Kuang, Yi Yang, Fei WuAAAI 2021 · 72 citations
- PepRec: Progressive Enhancement of Prompting for RecommendationYakun Yu, Shiang Qi, Baochun Li, Di NiuEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court SettingLuyao Ma, Yating Zhang, Tianyi Wang, Xiaozhong Liu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 52 citations
