How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence
Haoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Abstract
Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. In recent years, LegalAI has drawn increasing attention rapidly from both AI researchers and legal professionals, as LegalAI is beneficial to the legal system for liberating legal professionals from a maze of paperwork. Legal professionals often think about how to solve tasks from rulebased and symbol-based methods, while NLP researchers concentrate more on data-driven and embedding methods. In this paper, we describe the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI. We illustrate the tasks from the perspectives of legal professionals and NLP researchers and show several representative applications in LegalAI. We conduct experiments and provide an indepth analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of existing works to explore possible future directions. You can find the implementation of our work from https://github. com/thunlp/CLAIM .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- Infusing Disease Knowledge into BERT for Health Question Answering, Medical Inference and Disease Name RecognitionYun He, Ziwei Zhu, Yin Zhang, Qin Chen et al.EMNLP 2020 · 103 citations
- MultiEURLEX - A multi-lingual and multi-label legal document classification dataset for zero-shot cross-lingual transferIlias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Ion AndroutsopoulosEMNLP 2021 · 78 citations
- Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural NetworksLeilei Gan, Kun Kuang, Yi Yang, Fei WuAAAI 2021 · 72 citations
- KnowGPT: Knowledge Graph based Prompting for Large Language ModelsQinggang Zhang, Junnan Dong, Hao Chen, Daochen Zha et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 66 citations
- Facing the Elephant in the Room: Visual Prompt Tuning or Full finetuning?Cheng Han, Qifan Wang, Yiming Cui, Wenguan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 43 citations
Builds on3
- JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering DatasetHaoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 212 citations
- Iteratively Questioning and Answering for Interpretable Legal Judgment PredictionHaoxi Zhong, Yuzhong Wang, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 133 citations
- Latent Relation Language ModelsHiroaki Hayashi, Zecong Hu, Chenyan Xiong, Graham NeubigAAAI 2020 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Legal Judgment Prediction: A Reflection on the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2026
- Legal Case Retrieval: A Survey of the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2024 · 15 citations
- LexRel: Benchmarking Legal Relation Extraction for Chinese Civil CasesYida Cai, Ranjuexiao Hu, Huiyuan Xie, Chenyang Li et al.ACL 2026
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
- De-Biased Court's View Generation with CausalityYiquan Wu, Kun Kuang, Yating Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu et al.EMNLP 2020 · 71 citations
