CDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward Modeling
Dengcan Liu, Fengkai Yang, Xiaohan Wang, Shurui Yan, Jiajun Chai, Jiahao Li, Yikun Ban, Zhendong Mao, Wei Lin, Guojun Yin
Abstract
Reward modeling is essential for aligning Large Language Models(LLMs) with human preferences, yet conventional reward models suffer from poor interpretability and heavy reliance on costly expert annotations. While recent rubric-based approaches enhance evaluation transparency, they lack systematic quality control, yielding noisy and redundant criteria, failing to mitigate persistent biases (e.g., verbosity, position) in LLM evaluators, and creating a scalability-reliability trade-off. To address these limitations, we propose CDRRM (Contrast-Driven Rubric Reward Model), a framework built on a novel Contrast-then-Synthesis paradigm for high-quality rubric generation and guided preference judgment. CDRRM first conducts multi-dimensional contrastive profiling on preference pairs to identify causal discriminative factors, then synthesizes these insights into compact, context-aware rubrics to guide preference judgments. Extensive experiments on three authoritative benchmarks (RewardBench, RMBench, RMB) demonstrate that CDRRM achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse domains and effectively mitigates aforementioned evaluation biases. Notably, our approach delivers exceptional data efficiency: training the rubric generator on only 3k high-quality samples empowers a frozen pre-trained judge model to outperform fully fine-tuned baselines. This work offers a scalable, interpretable, and data-efficient path for reward modeling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0e0cf57-72c7-48e2-9063-e1f1dc20c3b4Cited by top-tier papers2
- Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaodong Lu, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Placing Puzzle Pieces Where They Matter: A Question Augmentation Framework for Reinforcement LearningYangyi Fang, Haolin ShiACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned ModelsAlexander Pan, Kush Bhatia, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2022 · 293 citations
- ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI FeedbackGanqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding, Guanming Yao et al.ICML 2024 · 286 citations
- RM-R1: Reward Modeling as ReasoningXiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin et al.ICLR 2026 · 147 citations
- Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference FeedbackHamish Ivison, Yizhong Wang, Jiacheng Liu, Zeqiu Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
Related papers
- OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM AlignmentTianci Liu, Ran Xu, Tony Yu, Ilgee Hong et al.ACL 2026 · 75 citations
- RubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human StandardsJunyi Zhou, Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Fuyuan Lyu et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- Interpreting Language Reward Models via Contrastive ExplanationsJunqi Jiang, Tom Bewley, Saumitra Mishra, Freddy Lécué et al.ICLR 2025
- PaTaRM: Bridging Pairwise and Pointwise Signals via Preference-Aware Task-Adaptive Reward ModelingAi Jian, Jingqing Ruan, Xing Ma, Dailin Li et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Learning LLM-as-a-Judge for Preference AlignmentZiyi Ye, Xiangsheng Li, Qiuchi Li, Qingyao Ai et al.ICLR 2025
