RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning
Xiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin, Cheng Qian, Yu Wang, Hongru Wang, Yu Zhang, Denghui Zhang, Tong Zhang, Hanghang Tong, Heng Ji
Abstract
Reward modeling is essential for aligning large language models with human preferences through reinforcement learning. To provide accurate reward signals, a reward model (RM) should stimulate deep thinking and conduct interpretable reasoning before assigning a score or a judgment. Inspired by recent advances of long chain-of-thought on reasoning-intensive tasks, we hypothesize and validate that integrating reasoning into reward modeling significantly enhances RM's interpretability and performance. We introduce a new class of generative reward models, Reasoning Reward Models (REASRMS), which formulate reward modeling as a reasoning task. We propose a reasoning-oriented training pipeline and train a family of REASRMS, RM-R1. RM-R1 features a chain-of-rubrics (CoR) mechanism -self-generating sample-level chat rubrics or math/code solutions, and evaluating candidate responses against them. The training of RM-R1 consists of two key stages: (1) distillation of high-quality reasoning chains and (2) reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. Empirically, our models achieve superior performance across three reward model benchmarks on average, outperforming much larger open-weight models (e.g., INF-ORM-Llama3.1-70B) and proprietary ones (e.g., GPT-4o) by up to 4.9%. Beyond final performance, we perform thorough analyses to understand the key ingredients of successful REASRM training 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers56
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI SynergyChris Yuhao Liu, Liang Zeng, Yuzhen Xiao, Jujie He et al.ICLR 2026 · 211 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Evolving Rubrics for Deep ResearchRulin Shao, Akari Asai, Shannon Shen, Hamish Ivison et al.ICML 2026 · 78 citations
- OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM AlignmentTianci Liu, Ran Xu, Tony Yu, Ilgee Hong et al.ACL 2026 · 75 citations
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?Samuel Stanton, Pavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Alexander A. Alemi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 318 citations
- Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial ProblemsZhiyuan Liu, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu MaICLR 2024 · 259 citations
Related papers
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Think-RM: Enabling Long-Horizon Reasoning in Generative Reward ModelsIlgee Hong, Changlong Yu, Liang Qiu, Weixiang Yan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Reward Reasoning ModelsJiaxin Guo, Zewen Chi, Li Dong, Qingxiu Dong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reward Model through Reinforcement Fine-TuningYibin Wang, Zhimin Li, Yuhang Zang, Chunyu Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 102 citations
- DeepOR: A Deep Reasoning Foundation Model for Optimization ModelingZiyang Xiao, Yuan Jessica Wang, Xiongwei Han, Shisi Guan et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
