Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy
Chris Yuhao Liu, Liang Zeng, Yuzhen Xiao, Jujie He, Jiacai Liu, Chaojie Wang, Rui Yan, Wei Shen, Fuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Yang Liu
Abstract
Despite the critical role of reward models (RMs) in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), current state-of-the-art open RMs perform poorly on most existing evaluation benchmarks, failing to capture the spectrum of nuanced and sophisticated human preferences. Even approaches incorporating advanced training techniques have failed to yield meaningful performance improvements. We hypothesize that this brittleness stems primarily from limitations in preference datasets, which are often narrowly scoped, synthetically labeled, or lack rigorous quality control. To address these challenges, we present a large-scale preference dataset comprising 40 million preference pairs, named SynPref-40M. To enable data curation at scale, we design a human-AI synergistic two-stage pipeline that leverages the complementary strengths of human annotation quality and AI scalability. In this pipeline, humans provide verified annotations, while Large Language Models (LLMs) perform automatic curation based on human guidance. Training on this preference mixture, we introduce Skywork-Reward-V2, a suite of eight reward models ranging from 0.6B to 8B parameters, trained on a carefully curated subset of 26 million preference pairs from SynPref-40M. We demonstrate that Skywork-Reward-V2 is versatile across a wide range of capabilities, including alignment with human preferences, objective correctness, safety, resistance to stylistic biases, and best-of-N scaling. These reward models achieve state-of-the-art performance across seven major reward model benchmarks, outperform the latest paradigm of generative reward models, and demonstrate strong downstream performance. Ablation studies confirm that the effectiveness of our approach stems not only from data scale but also from high-quality curation. The Skywork-Reward-V2 series represents substantial progress in open reward models, highlighting the untapped potential of existing preference datasets and demonstrating how human-AI curation synergy can unlock significantly higher data quality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe2436a0-a1e8-4d40-bd4b-98951a32e83aCited by top-tier papers57
- OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM AlignmentTianci Liu, Ran Xu, Tony Yu, Ilgee Hong et al.ACL 2026 · 75 citations
- Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language EnvironmentsAlejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou et al.ACL 2026 · 51 citations
- Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-TrainingJunkai Zhang, Zihao Wang, Lin Gui, Swarnashree Mysore Sathyendra et al.ICLR 2026 · 48 citations
- Don't Settle Too Early: Self-Reflective Remasking for Diffusion Language ModelsZemin Huang, Yuhang Wang, Zhiyang Chen, Guo-Jun QiICLR 2026 · 40 citations
- Post-training Large Language Models for Diverse High-Quality ResponsesYilei Chen, Souradip Chakraborty, Lorenz Wolf, Ioannis Paschalidis et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak SupervisionCollin Burns, Pavel Izmailov, Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Bowen Baker et al.ICML 2024 · 443 citations
Related papers
- Cheems: A Practical Guidance for Building and Evaluating Chinese Reward Models from ScratchXueru Wen, Jie Lou, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- RLTHF: Targeted Human Feedback for LLM AlignmentYifei Xu, Tusher Chakraborty, Emre Kiciman, Bibek Aryal et al.ICML 2025
- MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM AlignmentYifan Zhang, Tao Yu, Haochen Tian, Chaoyou Fu et al.ICML 2025
- ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment FrameworkKai Qin, Liangxin Liu, Yu Liang, Longzheng Wang et al.ACL 2026
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
