Cheems: A Practical Guidance for Building and Evaluating Chinese Reward Models from Scratch
Xueru Wen, Jie Lou, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu, Xing Yu, Yuqiu Ji, Guohai Xu, Hongyu Lin, Ben He, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Debing Zhang
Abstract
Reward models (RMs) are crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, most RM research is centered on English and relies heavily on synthetic resources, which leads to limited and less reliable datasets and benchmarks for Chinese. To address this gap, we introduce CheemsBench, a fully human-annotated RM evaluation benchmark within Chinese contexts, and CheemsPreference, a large-scale and diverse preference dataset annotated through human-machine collaboration to support Chinese RM training. We systematically evaluate open-source discriminative and generative RMs on CheemsBench and observe significant limitations in their ability to capture human preferences in Chinese scenarios. Additionally, based on CheemsPreference, we construct an RM that achieves state-of-the-art performance on CheemsBench, demonstrating the necessity of human supervision in RM training. Our findings reveal that scaled AI-generated data struggles to fully capture human preferences, emphasizing the importance of high-quality human supervision in RM development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b656012-2a82-4fbf-9340-ef1e54226919Builds on5
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
- Rethinking Reward Model Evaluation: Are We Barking up the Wrong Tree?Xueru Wen, Jie Lou, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin et al.ICLR 2025
- RMB: Comprehensively benchmarking reward models in LLM alignmentEnyu Zhou, Guodong Zheng, Binghai Wang, Zhiheng Xi et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual SettingsSrishti Gureja, Lester James Validad Miranda, Shayekh Bin Islam, Rishabh Maheshwary et al.ACL 2025
- Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward ModelingJiaxuan Wang, Yulan Hu, Wenjin Yang, Zheng Pan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- StoryAlign: Evaluating and Training Reward Models for Story GenerationHaotian Xia, Hao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Bin Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI SynergyChris Yuhao Liu, Liang Zeng, Yuzhen Xiao, Jujie He et al.ICLR 2026 · 211 citations
- GRAM: A Generative Foundation Reward Model for Reward GeneralizationChenglong Wang, Yang Gan, Yifu Huo, Yongyu Mu et al.ICML 2025
