M-RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models in Multilingual Settings
Srishti Gureja, Lester James Validad Miranda, Shayekh Bin Islam, Rishabh Maheshwary, Drishti Sharma, Gusti Triandi Winata, Nathan Lambert, Sebastian Ruder, Sara Hooker, Marzieh Fadaee
Abstract
Reward models (RMs) have driven the state-ofthe-art performance of LLMs today by enabling the integration of human feedback into the language modeling process. However, RMs are primarily trained and evaluated in English, and their capabilities in multilingual settings remain largely understudied. In this work, we conduct a systematic evaluation of several reward models in multilingual settings. We first construct the first-of-its-kind multilingual RM evaluation benchmark, M-REWARDBENCH, consisting of 2.87k preference instances for 23 typologically diverse languages, that tests the chat, safety, reasoning, and translation capabilities of RMs. We then rigorously evaluate a wide range of reward models on M-REWARDBENCH, offering fresh insights into their performance across diverse languages. We identify a significant gap in RMs' performances between English and non-English languages and show that RM preferences can change substantially from one language to another. We also present several findings on how different multilingual aspects impact RM performance. Specifically, we show that the performance of RMs is improved with improved translation quality. Similarly, we demonstrate that the models exhibit better performance for high-resource languages. We release the M-REWARDBENCH dataset and the codebase in this study to facilitate a better understanding of RM evaluation in multilingual settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e49af255-7e97-4b69-8175-28ec007555abCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
- Generative Judge for Evaluating AlignmentJunlong Li, Shichao Sun, Weizhe Yuan, Run-Ze Fan et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- mR3: Multilingual Rubric-Agnostic Reward Reasoning ModelsDavid Anugraha, Shou-Yi Hung, Zilu Tang, En-Shiun Annie Lee et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Cheems: A Practical Guidance for Building and Evaluating Chinese Reward Models from ScratchXueru Wen, Jie Lou, Zichao Li, Yaojie Lu et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- UniRRM: Unified Reasoning Reward Models Across Languages and Evaluation ParadigmsPeng Lai, Yichao Du, Junchao Wu, Weibo Gao et al.ICML 2026
- RMB: Comprehensively benchmarking reward models in LLM alignmentEnyu Zhou, Guodong Zheng, Binghai Wang, Zhiheng Xi et al.ICLR 2025
- Evaluating and Improving Cultural Awareness of Reward Models for LLM AlignmentHongbin Zhang, Kehai Chen, Xuefeng Bai, Yang Xiang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
