Think-RM: Enabling Long-Horizon Reasoning in Generative Reward Models
Ilgee Hong, Changlong Yu, Liang Qiu, Weixiang Yan, Zhenghao Xu, Haoming Jiang, Qingru Zhang, Qin Lu, Xin Liu, Chao Zhang, Tuo Zhao
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has become a powerful post-training paradigm for aligning large language models with human preferences. A core challenge in RLHF is constructing accurate reward signals, where the conventional Bradley-Terry reward models (BT RMs) often suffer from sensitivity to data size and coverage, as well as vulnerability to reward hacking. Generative reward models (GenRMs) offer a more robust alternative by generating chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales followed by a final reward. However, existing GenRMs rely on shallow, vertically scaled reasoning, limiting their capacity to handle nuanced or complex (e.g., reasoning-intensive) tasks. Moreover, their pairwise preference outputs are incompatible with standard RLHF algorithms that require pointwise reward signals. In this work, we introduce Think-RM, a training framework that enables long-horizon reasoning in GenRMs by modeling an internal thinking process. Rather than producing structured, externally provided rationales, Think-RM generates flexible, self-guided reasoning traces that support advanced capabilities such as self-reflection, hypothetical reasoning, and divergent reasoning. To elicit these reasoning abilities, we first warm-up the models by supervised fine-tuning (SFT) over long CoT data. We then further improve the model's long-horizon abilities by rule-based reinforcement learning (RL). In addition, we propose a novel pairwise RLHF pipeline that directly optimizes policies using pairwise preference rewards, eliminating the need for pointwise reward conversion and enabling more effective use of Think-RM outputs. Experiments show that Think-RM achieves state-of-the-art results on RM-Bench, outperforming both BT RM and vertically scaled GenRM by 8%. When combined with our pairwise RLHF pipeline, it demonstrates superior end-policy performance compared to traditional approaches. This depth-oriented approach not only broadens the GenRM design space but also establishes a new paradigm for preference-based policy optimization in RLHF. The code, datasets, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/IlgeeHong/Think-RM .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3babe294-950d-421b-a16a-fd8503e3f545Cited by top-tier papers5
- Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement LearningRan Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Reward Reasoning ModelsJiaxin Guo, Zewen Chi, Li Dong, Qingxiu Dong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- VR-Thinker: Boosting Multimodal Reward Models through Think with Image ReasoningQunzhong Wang, Jie Liu, Jiajun Liang, Yuanxing Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
- Leveraging Verifier-Based Reinforcement Learning in Image EditingHanzhong Guo, Jie Wu, Jie Liu, Yu Gao et al.CVPR 2026 · 9 citations
- Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-TrainingRan Xu, Tianci Liu, Zihan Dong, Tony Yu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on13
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- RM-R1: Reward Modeling as ReasoningXiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin et al.ICLR 2026 · 147 citations
- Generative RLHF-V: Learning Principles from Multi-modal Human PreferenceJiayi Zhou, Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Jiapeng Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment FrameworkKai Qin, Liangxin Liu, Yu Liang, Longzheng Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reward Model through Reinforcement Fine-TuningYibin Wang, Zhimin Li, Yuhang Zang, Chunyu Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 102 citations
- Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-JudgeHui Huang, Yancheng He, Hongli Zhou, Rui Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 12 citations
