Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
Xiaodong Lu, Xiaohan Wang, Jiajun Chai, Guojun Yin, Wei Lin, Zhijun Chen, Yu Luo, Fuzhen Zhuang, Yikun Ban, deqing wang
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, existing RLVR methods utilize rollouts in an indiscriminate and short-horizon manner: responses of heterogeneous quality within each prompt are treated uniformly, and historical rollouts are discarded after a single use. This leads to noisy supervision, poor sample efficiency, and suboptimal policy updates. We address these issues by formulating rollout scheduling in RLVR as a contextual bandit problem and proposing a unified neural scheduling framework that adaptively selects high-value rollouts throughout training. Each rollout is treated as an arm whose reward is defined by the induced performance gain between consecutive optimization steps. The resulting scheduler supports both noise-aware intra-group selection and adaptive global reuse of historical rollouts within a single principled framework. We provide theoretical justification by deriving sublinear regret bounds and showing that enlarging the rollout buffer improves the achievable performance upper bound. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in performance and training efficiency across multiple RLVR optimization methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 207e87d7-708e-497f-ac06-4df134ba2b5eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
Related papers
- ExGRPO: Learning to Reason from ExperienceRunzhe Zhan, Yafu Li, Zhi Wang, Xiaoye Qu et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
- Random Policy Valuation is Enough for LLM Reasoning with Verifiable RewardsHaoran He, Yuxiao Ye, Qingpeng Cai, Chen Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM ReasoningJinda Lu, Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Shuo Yang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Stable and Efficient Single-Rollout RL for Multimodal ReasoningRui Liu, Dian Yu, Lei Ke, Haolin Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 13 citations
- Depth-Breadth Synergy in RLVR: Unlocking LLM Reasoning Gains with Adaptive ExplorationZhicheng Yang, Zhijiang Guo, Yinya Huang, Yongxin Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 38 citations
