Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Training
Pau de Jorge Aranda, Adel Bibi, Riccardo Volpi, Amartya Sanyal, Philip H. S. Torr, Grégory Rogez, Puneet K. Dokania
Abstract
Recently, Wong et al. showed that adversarial training with single-step FGSM leads to a characteristic failure mode named Catastrophic Overfitting (CO), in which a model becomes suddenly vulnerable to multi-step attacks. Experimentally they showed that simply adding a random perturbation prior to FGSM (RS-FGSM) could prevent CO. However, Andriushchenko and Flammarion observed that RS-FGSM still leads to CO for larger perturbations, and proposed a computationally expensive regularizer (GradAlign) to avoid it. In this work, we methodically revisit the role of noise and clipping in single-step adversarial training. Contrary to previous intuitions, we find that using a stronger noise around the clean sample combined with not clipping is highly effective in avoiding CO for large perturbation radii. We then propose Noise-FGSM (N-FGSM) that, while providing the benefits of single-step adversarial training, does not suffer from CO. Empirical analyses on a large suite of experiments show that N-FGSM is able to match or surpass the performance of previous state-of-the-art GradAlign, while achieving 3x speed-up. Code can be found in https://github.com/pdejorge/N-FGSM
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers19
- Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples RegularizationRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Tongliang LiuNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- Towards Stable and Efficient Adversarial Training against l1 Bounded Adversarial AttacksYulun Jiang, Chen Liu, Zhichao Huang, Mathieu Salzmann et al.ICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Robust NAS under adversarial training: benchmark, theory, and beyondYongtao Wu, Fanghui Liu, Carl-Johann Simon-Gabriel, Grigorios Chrysos et al.ICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut DependencyRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Bo Han, Hang Su et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Efficient local linearity regularization to overcome catastrophic overfittingElías Abad-Rocamora, Fanghui Liu, Grigorios Chrysos, Pablo M. Olmos et al.ICLR 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on10
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial TrainingMaksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial TrainingHoki Kim, Woojin Lee, Jaewook LeeAAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Mitigating Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training via Label Information EliminationChao Pan, Ke Tang, Qing Li, Xin YaoICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Subspace Adversarial TrainingTao Li, Yingwen Wu, Sizhe Chen, Kun Fang et al.CVPR 2022 · 59 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Training against Bounded PerturbationsXuyang Zhong, Yixiao Huang, Chen LiuNeurIPS 2025
- Taxonomy Driven Fast Adversarial TrainingKun Tong, Chengze Jiang, Jie Gui, Yuan CaoAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
