Subspace Adversarial Training
Tao Li, Yingwen Wu, Sizhe Chen, Kun Fang, Xiaolin Huang
Abstract
Single-step adversarial training (AT) has received wide attention as it proved to be both efficient and robust. However, a serious problem of catastrophic overfitting exists, i.e., the robust accuracy against projected gradient descent (PGD) attack suddenly drops to 0% during the training. In this paper, we approach this problem from a novel perspective of optimization and firstly reveal the close link between the fast-growing gradient of each sample and overfitting, which can also be applied to understand robust overfitting in multi-step AT. To control the growth of the gradient, we propose a new AT method, Subspace Adversarial Training (Sub-AT), which constrains AT in a carefully extracted subspace. It successfully resolves both kinds of overfitting and significantly boosts the robustness. In subspace, we also allow single-step AT with larger steps and larger radius, further improving the robustness performance. As a result, we achieve state-of-the-art single-step AT performance. Without any regularization term, our single-step AT can reach over 51 % robust accuracy against strong PGD-50 attack of radius 8/255 on CIFAR-10, reaching a competitive performance against standard multi-step PGD-10 AT with huge computational advantages. The code is released at https://github.com/nblt/Sub-AT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f335cf04-623e-40f3-ac45-5de4ef49e0efCited by top-tier papers15
- Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial TrainingSravanti Addepalli, Samyak Jain, Venkatesh Babu R.NeurIPS 2022 · 77 citations
- Adversarial Attack on Attackers: Post-Process to Mitigate Black-Box Score-Based Query AttacksSizhe Chen, Zhehao Huang, Qinghua Tao, Yingwen Wu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Eliminating Catastrophic Overfitting Via Abnormal Adversarial Examples RegularizationRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Tongliang LiuNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- Robust Overfitting Does Matter: Test-Time Adversarial Purification with FGSMLinyu Tang, Lei ZhangCVPR 2024 · 13 citations
- Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut DependencyRunqi Lin, Chaojian Yu, Bo Han, Hang Su et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on14
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial TrainingHoki Kim, Woojin Lee, Jaewook LeeAAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Taxonomy Driven Fast Adversarial TrainingKun Tong, Chengze Jiang, Jie Gui, Yuan CaoAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Understanding and Increasing Efficiency of Frank-Wolfe Adversarial TrainingTheodoros Tsiligkaridis, Jay RobertsCVPR 2022 · 6 citations
- Revisiting and Advancing Fast Adversarial Training Through The Lens of Bi-Level OptimizationYihua Zhang, Guanhua Zhang, Prashant Khanduri, Mingyi Hong et al.ICML 2022 · 107 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Training against Bounded PerturbationsXuyang Zhong, Yixiao Huang, Chen LiuNeurIPS 2025
