Mitigating Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training via Label Information Elimination
Chao Pan, Ke Tang, Qing Li, Xin Yao
Abstract
Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) employs the single-step Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) to generate adversarial examples, reducing the computational costs of traditional adversarial training. However, FAT suffers from Catastrophic Overfitting (CO), where models' robust accuracy against multi-step attacks plummets to zero during training. Recent studies indicate that CO occurs because single-step adversarial perturbations contain label information that models exploit for prediction, leading to overfitting and diminished robustness against more complex attacks. In this paper, we discover that after CO occurs, the label information of certain samples can transfer across different samples, significantly increasing the likelihood of modified images being classified as the intended label. This discovery offers a new perspective on why various adversarial initialization strategies are effective. To address this issue, we introduce an innovative FAT strategy that leverages special samples to capture transferable label information and proactively removes potential label information during training, complemented by a non-uniform label smoothing technique to further eliminate label information. Experimental results across three datasets demonstrate that our method maintains competitive robustness against several attacks compared to other FAT approaches, with ablation studies confirming the effectiveness of our methodology. The code is available at https://github.com/fzjcdt/LIET .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e5b7d7b8-735a-45e9-8674-e698bf6a211fBuilds on12
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial TrainingMaksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial TrainingHoki Kim, Woojin Lee, Jaewook LeeAAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Fast Adversarial Training with Smooth ConvergenceMengnan Zhao, Lihe Zhang, Yuqiu Kong, Baocai YinICCV 2023 · 16 citations
- Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial TrainingMengnan Zhao, Lihe Zhang, Bo Wang, Tianhang Zheng et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Taxonomy Driven Fast Adversarial TrainingKun Tong, Chengze Jiang, Jie Gui, Yuan CaoAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial TrainingPau de Jorge Aranda, Adel Bibi, Riccardo Volpi, Amartya Sanyal et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 69 citations
