Mitigating Error Amplification in Fast Adversarial Training
Mengnan Zhao, Lihe Zhang, Bo Wang, Tianhang Zheng, Hong Zhong, Geyong Min
Abstract
Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) has proven effective in enhancing model robustness by encouraging networks to learn perturbation-invariant representations. However, FAT often suffers from catastrophic overfitting (CO), where the model overfits to the training attack and fails to generalize to unseen ones. Moreover, robustness-oriented optimization typically leads to notable performance degradation on clean inputs, and such degradation becomes increasingly severe as the perturbation budget grows. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of how guidance strength affects model performance by modulating perturbation and supervision levels across distinct confidence groups. The findings reveal that low-confidence samples are the primary contributors to CO and the robustness-accuracy trade-off. Building on this insight, we propose a Distribution-aware Dynamic Guidance (DDG) strategy that dynamically adjusts both the perturbation budget and supervision signal. Specifically, DDG scales the perturbation magnitude according to the sample confidence at the ground-truth class, thereby guiding samples toward consistent decision boundaries while mitigating the influence of learning spurious correlations. Simultaneously, it dynamically adjusts the supervision signal based on the prediction state of each sample, preventing overemphasis on incorrect signals. To alleviate potential gradient instability arising from dynamic guidance, we further design a weighted regularization constraint. Extensive experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that DDG effectively alleviates both CO and the robustness-accuracy trade-off.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4d7aa4d1-52c3-4e10-9c35-d7584ef72e84Builds on27
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
Related papers
- Fast Adversarial Training with Smooth ConvergenceMengnan Zhao, Lihe Zhang, Yuqiu Kong, Baocai YinICCV 2023 · 16 citations
- Mitigating Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training via Label Information EliminationChao Pan, Ke Tang, Qing Li, Xin YaoICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting RobustnessEuijin You, Hyang-Won LeeICML 2025
- Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial TrainingHoki Kim, Woojin Lee, Jaewook LeeAAAI 2021 · 135 citations
- Understanding and Increasing Efficiency of Frank-Wolfe Adversarial TrainingTheodoros Tsiligkaridis, Jay RobertsCVPR 2022 · 6 citations
