SafeWorld: Geo-Diverse Safety Alignment
Da Yin, Haoyi Qiu, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring safety is a crucial and widely discussed topic. However, existing works often overlook the geo-diversity of cultural and legal standards across the world. To demonstrate the challenges posed by geo-diverse safety standards, we introduce SafeWorld, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to generate responses that are not only helpful but also culturally sensitive and legally compliant across diverse global contexts. SafeWorld encompasses 2,342 test user queries, each grounded in high-quality, human-verified cultural norms and legal policies from 50 countries and 493 regions/races. On top of it, we propose a multi-dimensional automatic safety evaluation framework that assesses the contextual appropriateness, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of responses. Our evaluations reveal that current LLMs struggle to meet these criteria. To enhance LLMs' alignment with geo-diverse safety standards, we synthesize helpful preference pairs for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) alignment training. The preference pair construction aims to encourage LLMs to behave appropriately and provide precise references to relevant cultural norms and policies when necessary. Our trained SafeWorldLM outperforms all competing models, including GPT-4o on all three evaluation dimensions by a large margin. Global human evaluators also note a nearly 20% higher winning rate in helpfulness and harmfulness evaluation. Our code and data can be found here: https://github.com/PlusLabNLP/SafeWorld.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ad056bb7-5ca2-41fd-8d37-24d65d7802a0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Unintended Harms of Value-Aligned LLMs: Psychological and Empirical InsightsSooyung Choi, Jaehyeok Lee, Xiaoyuan Yi, Jing Yao et al.ACL 2025
- Controllable Safety Alignment: Inference-Time Adaptation to Diverse Safety RequirementsJingyu Zhang, Ahmed Elgohary, Ahmed Magooda, Daniel Khashabi et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on12
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language ModelsChujie Zheng, Fan Yin, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng et al.ICML 2024 · 116 citations
Related papers
- SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language ModelsZhexin Zhang, Leqi Lei, Lindong Wu, Rui Sun et al.ACL 2024
- Incorporating Diverse Perspectives in Cultural Alignment: Survey of Evaluation Benchmarks Through A Three-Dimensional FrameworkMeng-Chen Wu, Si-Chi Chin, Tess Wood, Ayush Goyal et al.EMNLP 2025
- LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language ModelsYida Lu, Jiale Cheng, Zhexin Zhang, Shiyao Cui et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMsWenxuan Wang, Xiaoyuan Liu, Kuiyi Gao, Jen-tse Huang et al.ACL 2025
- SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety RefusalTinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2025
