Distribution Models for Falsification and Verification of DNNs
Felipe Toledo, David Shriver, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Matthew B. Dwyer
Abstract
DNN validation and verification approaches that are input distribution agnostic waste effort on irrelevant inputs and report false property violations. Drawing on the large body of work on model-based validation and verification of traditional systems, we introduce the first approach that leverages environmental models to focus DNN falsification and verification on the relevant input space. Our approach, DFV, automatically builds an input distribution model using unsupervised learning, prefixes that model to the DNN to force all inputs to come from the learned distribution, and reformulates the property to the input space of the distribution model. This transformed verification problem allows existing DNN falsification and verification tools to target the input distribution – avoiding consideration of infeasible inputs. Our study of DFV with 7 falsification and verification tools, two DNNs defined over different data sets, and 93 distinct distribution models, provides clear evidence that the counterexamples found by the tools are much more representative of the data distribution, and it shows how the performance of DFV varies across domains, models, and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa911a42-8a9f-4faf-a1a8-4a6227825cf9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative ModelsMuhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi et al.ICML 2020 · 553 citations
- How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative ModelsAhmed M. Alaa, Boris van Breugel, Evgeny S. Saveliev, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2022 · 287 citations
- Model-based exploration of the frontier of behaviours for deep learning system testingVincenzo Riccio, Paolo TonellaFSE 2020 · 134 citations
- Improved Geometric Path Enumeration for Verifying ReLU Neural NetworksStanley Bak, Hoang-Dung Tran, Kerianne Hobbs, Taylor T. JohnsonCAV 2020 · 88 citations
Related papers
- Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative ModelsSwaroopa Dola, Matthew B. Dwyer, Mary Lou SoffaICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- VeriFlow: Modeling Distributions for Neural Network VerificationFaried Abu Zaid, Daniel Neider, Mustafa YalçinerAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Scalable Quantitative Verification For Deep Neural NetworksTeodora Baluta, Zheng Leong Chua, Kuldeep S. Meel, Prateek SaxenaICSE 2021 · 39 citations
- Repairing Failure-inducing Inputs with Input ReflectionYan Xiao, Yun Lin, Ivan Beschastnikh, Changsheng Sun et al.ASE 2022 · 8 citations
- Reducing DNN Properties to Enable Falsification with Adversarial AttacksDavid Shriver, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Matthew B. DwyerICSE 2021 · 18 citations
