Model-based exploration of the frontier of behaviours for deep learning system testing
Vincenzo Riccio, Paolo Tonella
Abstract
With the increasing adoption of Deep Learning (DL) for critical tasks, such as autonomous driving, the evaluation of the quality of systems that rely on DL has become crucial. Once trained, DL systems produce an output for any arbitrary numeric vector provided as input, regardless of whether it is within or outside the validity domain of the system under test. Hence, the quality of such systems is determined by the intersection between their validity domain and the regions where their outputs exhibit a misbehaviour.
In this paper, we introduce the notion of frontier of behaviours, i.e., the inputs at which the DL system starts to misbehave. If the frontier of misbehaviours is outside the validity domain of the system, the quality check is passed. Otherwise, the inputs at the intersection represent quality deficiencies of the system. We developed DeepJanus, a search-based tool that generates frontier inputs for DL systems. The experimental results obtained for the lane keeping component of a self-driving car show that the frontier of a well trained system contains almost exclusively unrealistic roads that violate the best practices of civil engineering, while the frontier of a poorly trained one includes many valid inputs that point to serious deficiencies of the system.
• Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 721809dc-f104-4fcf-9f64-916ceebf6592Cited by top-tier papers22
- DeepHyperion: exploring the feature space of deep learning-based systems through illumination searchTahereh Zohdinasab, Vincenzo Riccio, Alessio Gambi, Paolo TonellaISSTA 2021 · 76 citations
- ThirdEye: Attention Maps for Safe Autonomous Driving SystemsAndrea Stocco, Paulo J. Nunes, Marcelo d'Amorim, Paolo TonellaASE 2022 · 43 citations
- DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation ScoreVincenzo Riccio, Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaASE 2021 · 41 citations
- Are Machine Learning Cloud APIs Used Correctly?Chengcheng Wan, Shicheng Liu, Henry Hoffmann, Michael Maire et al.ICSE 2021 · 37 citations
- Many-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Online Testing of DNN-Enabled SystemsFitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, Lionel C. BriandICSE 2023 · 35 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Navigating the Testing of Evolving Deep Learning Systems: An Exploratory Interview StudyHanmo You, Zan Wang, Bin Lin, Junjie ChenICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- Towards characterizing adversarial defects of deep learning software from the lens of uncertaintyXiyue Zhang, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma, Xiaoning Du et al.ICSE 2020 · 69 citations
- Scalpel: Automotive Deep Learning Framework Testing via Assembling Model ComponentsYinglong Zou, Juan Zhai, Chunrong Fang, An Guo et al.ICSE 2026
- Misbehaviour prediction for autonomous driving systemsAndrea Stocco, Michael Weiss, Marco Calzana, Paolo TonellaICSE 2020 · 138 citations
- Importance-driven deep learning system testingSimos Gerasimou, Hasan Ferit Eniser, Alper Sen, Alper ÇakanICSE 2020 · 65 citations
