Lune

ICML2020Top-tier venue

Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models

Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi, Jaejun Yoo

2020Year
553Citations
164Top-tier citations

Abstract

Devising indicative evaluation metrics for the image generation task remains an open problem. The most widely used metric for measuring the similarity between real and generated images has been the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) score. Because it does not differentiate the fidelity and diversity aspects of the generated images, recent papers have introduced variants of precision and recall metrics to diagnose those properties separately. In this paper, we show that even the latest version of the precision and recall metrics are not reliable yet. For example, they fail to detect the match between two identical distributions, they are not robust against outliers, and the evaluation hyperparameters are selected arbitrarily. We propose density and coverage metrics that solve the above issues. We analytically and experimentally show that density and coverage provide more interpretable and reliable signals for practitioners than the existing metrics. Code: github.com/clovaai/generative-evaluation-prdc .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 944330e2-5153-4a8c-9a96-4af8ea7dca50

Cited by top-tier papers164

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines