Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Models
Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi, Jaejun Yoo
Abstract
Devising indicative evaluation metrics for the image generation task remains an open problem. The most widely used metric for measuring the similarity between real and generated images has been the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) score. Because it does not differentiate the fidelity and diversity aspects of the generated images, recent papers have introduced variants of precision and recall metrics to diagnose those properties separately. In this paper, we show that even the latest version of the precision and recall metrics are not reliable yet. For example, they fail to detect the match between two identical distributions, they are not robust against outliers, and the evaluation hyperparameters are selected arbitrarily. We propose density and coverage metrics that solve the above issues. We analytically and experimentally show that density and coverage provide more interpretable and reliable signals for practitioners than the existing metrics. Code: github.com/clovaai/generative-evaluation-prdc .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 944330e2-5153-4a8c-9a96-4af8ea7dca50Cited by top-tier papers164
- TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion ModelsAkim Kotelnikov, Dmitry Baranchuk, Ivan Rubachev, Artem BabenkoICML 2023 · 518 citations
- StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse DatasetsAxel Sauer, Katja Schwarz, Andreas GeigerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 326 citations
- How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative ModelsAhmed M. Alaa, Boris van Breugel, Evgeny S. Saveliev, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2022 · 287 citations
- Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelsGeorge Stein, Jesse C. Cresswell, Rasa Hosseinzadeh, Yi Sui et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 260 citations
- DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated TextXianjun Yang, Wei Cheng, Yue Wu, Linda Ruth Petzold et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- Probabilistic Precision and Recall Towards Reliable Evaluation of Generative ModelsDogyun Park, Suhyun KimICCV 2023 · 12 citations
- Enhanced Generative Model Evaluation with Clipped Density and CoverageNicolas Salvy, Hugues Talbot, Bertrand ThirionICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Emergent Asymmetry of Precision and Recall for Measuring Fidelity and Diversity of Generative Models in High DimensionsMahyar Khayatkhoei, Wael Abd-AlmageedICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Feature Likelihood Score: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using SamplesMarco Jiralerspong, Avishek Joey Bose, Ian Gemp, Chongli Qin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 39 citations
- Rethinking FID: Towards a Better Evaluation Metric for Image GenerationSadeep Jayasumana, Srikumar Ramalingam, Andreas Veit, Daniel Glasner et al.CVPR 2024
