Repairing Failure-inducing Inputs with Input Reflection
Yan Xiao, Yun Lin, Ivan Beschastnikh, Changsheng Sun, David S. Rosenblum, Jin Song Dong
Abstract
Trained with a sufficiently large training and testing dataset, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are expected to generalize. However, inputs may deviate from the training dataset distribution in real deployments. This is a fundamental issue with using a finite dataset, which may lead deployed DNNs to mis-predict in production. Inspired by input-debugging techniques for traditional software systems, we propose a runtime approach to identify and fix failureinducing inputs in deep learning systems. Specifically, our approach targets DNN mis-predictions caused by unexpected (deviating and out-of-distribution) runtime inputs. Our approach has two steps. First, it recognizes and distinguishes deviating ("unseen" semantically-preserving) and out-of-distribution inputs from indistribution inputs. Second, our approach fixes the failure-inducing inputs by transforming them into inputs from the training set that have similar semantics. We call this process input reflection and formulate it as a search problem over the embedding space on the training set. We implemented a tool called InputReflector based on the above two-step approach and evaluated it with experiments on three DNN models trained on CIFAR-10, MNIST, and FMNIST image datasets. The results show that InputReflector can effectively distinguish deviating inputs that retain semantics of the distribution (e.g., zoomed images) and out-of-distribution inputs from in-distribution inputs. InputReflector repairs deviating inputs and achieves 30.78% accuracy improvement over original models. We also illustrate how InputReflector can be used to evaluate tests generated by deep learning testing tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5c2f5a7d-d1a6-43c0-9d45-d19fc907021cCited by top-tier papers4
- On-the-fly Improving Performance of Deep Code Models via Input DenoisingZhao Tian, Junjie Chen, Xiangyu ZhangASE 2023 · 8 citations
- BinAug: Enhancing Binary Similarity Analysis with Low-Cost Input RepairingWai Kin Wong, Huaijin Wang, Zongjie Li, Shuai WangICSE 2024 · 4 citations
- Inferring Data Preconditions from Deep Learning Models for Trustworthy Prediction in DeploymentShibbir Ahmed, Hongyang Gao, Hridesh RajanICSE 2024 · 3 citations
- CodeImprove: Program Adaptation for Deep Code ModelsRavishka Rathnasuriya, Zijie Zhao, Wei YangICSE 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on19
- Random Erasing Data AugmentationZhun Zhong, Liang Zheng, Guoliang Kang, Shaozi Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 4,134 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet SamplingQi Qian, Lei Shang, Baigui Sun, Juhua Hu et al.ICCV 2019 · 419 citations
- Is neuron coverage a meaningful measure for testing deep neural networks?Fabrice Harel-Canada, Lingxiao Wang, Muhammad Ali Gulzar, Quanquan Gu et al.FSE 2020 · 149 citations
- Fuzz testing based data augmentation to improve robustness of deep neural networksXiang Gao, Ripon K. Saha, Mukul R. Prasad, Abhik RoychoudhuryICSE 2020 · 116 citations
Related papers
- DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation ScoreVincenzo Riccio, Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaASE 2021 · 41 citations
- Dissector: input validation for deep learning applications by crossing-layer dissectionHuiyan Wang, Jingwei Xu, Chang Xu, Xiaoxing Ma et al.ICSE 2020 · 56 citations
- Cats Are Not Fish: Deep Learning Testing Calls for Out-Of-Distribution AwarenessDavid Berend, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma, Lingjun Zhou et al.ASE 2020 · 56 citations
- Operation is the hardest teacher: estimating DNN accuracy looking for mispredictionsAntonio Guerriero, Roberto Pietrantuono, Stefano RussoICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative ModelsSwaroopa Dola, Matthew B. Dwyer, Mary Lou SoffaICSE 2021 · 3 citations
