Inferring Data Preconditions from Deep Learning Models for Trustworthy Prediction in Deployment
Shibbir Ahmed, Hongyang Gao, Hridesh Rajan
Abstract
Deep learning models are trained with certain assumptions about the data during the development stage and then used for prediction in the deployment stage. It is important to reason about the trustworthiness of the model's predictions with unseen data during deployment. Existing methods for specifying and verifying traditional software are insufficient for this task, as they cannot handle the complexity of DNN model architecture and expected outcomes. In this work, we propose a novel technique that uses rules derived from neural network computations to infer data preconditions for a DNN model to determine the trustworthiness of its predictions. Our approach, DeepInfer involves introducing a novel abstraction for a trained DNN model that enables weakest precondition reasoning using Dijkstra's Predicate Transformer Semantics. By deriving rules over the inductive type of neural network abstract representation, we can overcome the matrix dimensionality issues that arise from the backward non-linear computation from the output layer to the input layer. We utilize the weakest precondition computation using rules of each kind of activation function to compute layer-wise precondition from the given postcondition on the final output of a deep neural network. We extensively evaluated DeepInfer on 29 real-world DNN models using four different datasets collected from five different sources and demonstrated the utility, effectiveness, and performance improvement over closely related work. DeepInfer efficiently detects correct and incorrect predictions of high-accuracy models with high recall (0.98) and high F-1 score (0.84) and has significantly improved over the prior technique, SelfChecker. The average runtime overhead of DeepInfer is low, 0.22 sec for all the unseen datasets. We also compared runtime overhead using the same hardware settings and found that DeepInfer is 3.27 times faster than SelfChecker, the state-of-the-art in this area.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on27
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- DeepGini: prioritizing massive tests to enhance the robustness of deep neural networksYang Feng, Qingkai Shi, Xinyu Gao, Jun Wan et al.ISSTA 2020 · 206 citations
- Misbehaviour prediction for autonomous driving systemsAndrea Stocco, Michael Weiss, Marco Calzana, Paolo TonellaICSE 2020 · 138 citations
- White-box fairness testing through adversarial samplingPeixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong et al.ICSE 2020 · 127 citations
- Repairing deep neural networks: fix patterns and challengesMd Johirul Islam, Rangeet Pan, Giang Nguyen, Hridesh RajanICSE 2020 · 102 citations
Related papers
- Self-Checking Deep Neural Networks in DeploymentYan Xiao, Ivan Beschastnikh, David S. Rosenblum, Changsheng Sun et al.ICSE 2021 · 36 citations
- Synthesizing Boxes Preconditions for Deep Neural NetworksZengyu Liu, Liqian Chen, Wanwei Liu, Ji WangISSTA 2024
- Distribution-Aware Testing of Neural Networks Using Generative ModelsSwaroopa Dola, Matthew B. Dwyer, Mary Lou SoffaICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- Automated Verification of Soundness of DNN CertifiersAvaljot Singh, Yasmin Sarita, Charith Mendis, Gagandeep SinghOOPSLA 2025 · 3 citations
- Detecting numerical bugs in neural network architecturesYuhao Zhang, Luyao Ren, Liqian Chen, Yingfei Xiong et al.FSE 2020 · 66 citations
