Fuzz testing based data augmentation to improve robustness of deep neural networks
Xiang Gao, Ripon K. Saha, Mukul R. Prasad, Abhik Roychoudhury
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNN) have been shown to be notoriously brittle to small perturbations in their input data. This problem is analogous to the over-fitting problem in test-based program synthesis and automatic program repair, which is a consequence of the incomplete specification, i.e., the limited tests or training examples, that the program synthesis or repair algorithm has to learn from. Recently, test generation techniques have been successfully employed to augment existing specifications of intended program behavior, to improve the generalizability of program synthesis and repair. Inspired by these approaches, in this paper, we propose a technique that re-purposes software testing methods, specifically mutation-based fuzzing, to augment the training data of DNNs, with the objective of enhancing their robustness. Our technique casts the DNN data augmentation problem as an optimization problem. It uses genetic search to generate the most suitable variant of an input data to use for training the DNN, while simultaneously identifying opportunities to accelerate training by skipping augmentation in many instances. We instantiate this technique in two tools, Sensei and Sensei-SA, and evaluate them on 15 DNN models spanning 5 popular image data-sets. Our evaluation shows that Sensei can improve the robust accuracy of the DNN, compared to the state of the art, on each of the 15 models, by upto 11.9% and 5.5% on average. Further, Sensei-SA can reduce the average DNN training time by 25%, while still improving robust accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc6fbf2f-3924-427d-a053-a63ccd7723a2Cited by top-tier papers28
- Natural Attack for Pre-trained Models of CodeZhou Yang, Jieke Shi, Junda He, David LoICSE 2022 · 150 citations
- Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of VarianceHung Viet Pham, Shangshu Qian, Jiannan Wang, Thibaud Lutellier et al.ASE 2020 · 91 citations
- Correlations between deep neural network model coverage criteria and model qualityShenao Yan, Guanhong Tao, Xuwei Liu, Juan Zhai et al.FSE 2020 · 75 citations
- DocTer: documentation-guided fuzzing for testing deep learning API functionsDanning Xie, Yitong Li, Mijung Kim, Hung Viet Pham et al.ISSTA 2022 · 72 citations
- MAAT: a novel ensemble approach to addressing fairness and performance bugs for machine learning softwareZhenpeng Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Federica Sarro, Mark HarmanFSE 2022 · 65 citations
Related papers
- DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation ScoreVincenzo Riccio, Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaASE 2021 · 41 citations
- Dynamic Data Fault Localization for Deep Neural NetworksYining Yin, Yang Feng, Shihao Weng, Zixi Liu et al.FSE 2023 · 10 citations
- RobOT: Robustness-Oriented Testing for Deep Learning SystemsJingyi Wang, Jialuo Chen, Youcheng Sun, Xingjun Ma et al.ICSE 2021 · 62 citations
- Mutation-based Fault Localization of Deep Neural NetworksAli Ghanbari, Deepak-George Thomas, Muhammad Arbab Arshad, Hridesh RajanASE 2023 · 20 citations
- Semantic Image Fuzzing of AI Perception SystemsTrey Woodlief, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Kevin SullivanICSE 2022 · 17 citations
