Dissector: input validation for deep learning applications by crossing-layer dissection
Huiyan Wang, Jingwei Xu, Chang Xu, Xiaoxing Ma, Jian Lu
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) applications are becoming increasingly popular. Their reliabilities largely depend on the performance of DL models integrated in these applications as a central classifying module. Traditional techniques need to retrain the models or rebuild and redeploy the applications for coping with unexpected conditions beyond the models' handling capabilities. In this paper, we take a fault tolerance approach, Dissector, to distinguishing those inputs that represent unexpected conditions (beyond-inputs) from normal inputs that are still within the models' handling capabilities (within-inputs), thus keeping the applications still function with expected reliabilities. The key insight of Dissector is that a DL model should interpret a within-input with increasing confidence, while a beyond-input would probably cause confused guesses in the prediction process. Dissector works in an application-specific way, adaptive to DL models used in applications, and extremely efficiently, scalable to large-size datasets from complex scenarios. The experimental evaluation shows that Dissector outperformed state-of-the-art techniques in the effectiveness (AUC: avg. 0.8935 and up to 0.9894) and efficiency (runtime overhead: only 3.3--5.8 milliseconds). Besides, it also exhibited encouraging usefulness in defensing against adversarial inputs (AUC: avg. 0.9983) and improving a DL model's actual accuracy in use (up to 16% for CIFAR-100 and 20% for ImageNet).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 819cdb75-b7b0-46d3-acf3-bcd0d0cf3cb8Cited by top-tier papers18
- Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of VarianceHung Viet Pham, Shangshu Qian, Jiannan Wang, Thibaud Lutellier et al.ASE 2020 · 91 citations
- Correlations between deep neural network model coverage criteria and model qualityShenao Yan, Guanhong Tao, Xuwei Liu, Juan Zhai et al.FSE 2020 · 75 citations
- AUTOTRAINER: An Automatic DNN Training Problem Detection and Repair SystemXiaoyu Zhang, Juan Zhai, Shiqing Ma, Chao ShenICSE 2021 · 62 citations
- ThirdEye: Attention Maps for Safe Autonomous Driving SystemsAndrea Stocco, Paulo J. Nunes, Marcelo d'Amorim, Paolo TonellaASE 2022 · 43 citations
- Self-Checking Deep Neural Networks in DeploymentYan Xiao, Ivan Beschastnikh, David S. Rosenblum, Changsheng Sun et al.ICSE 2021 · 36 citations
Builds on3
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic IntervalsShiqi Wang, Kexin Pei, Justin Whitehouse, Junfeng Yang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 523 citations
Related papers
- Repairing Failure-inducing Inputs with Input ReflectionYan Xiao, Yun Lin, Ivan Beschastnikh, Changsheng Sun et al.ASE 2022 · 8 citations
- DeepMetis: Augmenting a Deep Learning Test Set to Increase its Mutation ScoreVincenzo Riccio, Nargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaASE 2021 · 41 citations
- Dynamic Data Fault Localization for Deep Neural NetworksYining Yin, Yang Feng, Shihao Weng, Zixi Liu et al.FSE 2023 · 10 citations
- DNN-GP: Diagnosing and Mitigating Model's Faults Using Latent ConceptsShuo Wang, Hongsheng Hu, Jiamin Chang, Benjamin Zi Hao Zhao et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 2 citations
- Interpretability Based Neural Network RepairZuohui Chen, Jun Zhou, Youcheng Sun, Jingyi Wang et al.ISSTA 2024 · 3 citations
