On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agents

Large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown great abilities across various tasks due to the collaboration of expert agents, each focusing on a specific domain. However, the impact of clumsy or even malicious agents-those who frequently make errors in their tasks-on the overall performance of the system remains underexplored. This paper investigates: (1) What is the resilience of various system structures (e.g., A→B→C, A↔B↔C) under faulty agents, on different downstream tasks? (2) How can we increase system resilience to defend against these agents? To simulate faulty agents, we propose two approaches-AUTOTRANSFORM and AU-TOINJECT-which introduce mistakes into the agents' responses. Experiments on four downstream tasks using six systems show that the "hierarchical" structure, i.e., A→(B↔C), exhibits superior resilience with the lowest performance drop of 5.5%, compared to 10.5% and 23.7% of other two structures. To further improve resilience, we introduce (1) Challenger, that introduces a mechanism for each agent to challenge others' outputs, and (2) Inspector, an additional agent to review and correct messages, recovering up to 96.4% errors made by faulty agents. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ CUHK-ARISE/MAS-Resilience .