Among Us: Measuring and Mitigating Malicious Contributions in Model Collaboration Systems
Ziyuan Yang, Wenxuan Ding, Shangbin Feng, Yulia Tsvetkov
Abstract
Language models (LMs) are increasingly used in collaboration: multiple LMs trained by different parties collaborate through routing systems, multi-agent debate, model merging, and more. Critical safety risks remain in this decentralized paradigm: what if some of the models in multi-LLM systems are compromised or malicious? We first quantify the impact of malicious models by engineering four categories of malicious LMs, plug them into four types of popular model collaboration systems, and evaluate the compromised system across 10 datasets. We find that malicious models have a severe impact on the multi-LLM systems, especially for reasoning and safety domains where performance is lowered by 7.12% and 7.94% on average. We then propose mitigation strategies to alleviate the impact of malicious components, by employing external supervisors that oversee model collaboration to disable/mask them out to reduce their influence. On average, these strategies recover 95.31% of the initial performance, while making model collaboration systems fully resistant to malicious models remains an open research question. Our code is available at https: //github.com/Ziyuan-Yang/AmongUs .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f22f527e-60b2-4a11-aa72-a6be91a75d40Builds on36
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timeMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Rebecca Roelofs et al.ICML 2022 · 1,464 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
Related papers
- TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM SystemsIshan Kavathekar, Hemang Jain, Ameya Rathod, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru et al.ACL 2026 · 16 citations
- When AI Agents Collude Online: Financial Fraud Risks by Collaborative LLM Agents on Social PlatformsQibing Ren, Zhijie Zheng, Jiaxuan Guo, Junchi Yan et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Imperceptible Content Poisoning in LLM-Powered ApplicationsQuan Zhang, Chijin Zhou, Gwihwan Go, Binqi Zeng et al.ASE 2024 · 3 citations
- CAST: A Compiler-Based Framework for Systematically Testing LLM Compositional SafetyLu Yan, Zhuo Zhang, Xiangzhe Xu, Shengwei An et al.ISSTA 2026
- JPS: Jailbreak Multimodal Large Language Models with Collaborative Visual Perturbation and Textual SteeringRenmiao Chen, Shiyao Cui, Xuancheng Huang, Chengwei Pan et al.ACM MM 2025 · 5 citations
