When AI Agents Collude Online: Financial Fraud Risks by Collaborative LLM Agents on Social Platforms
Qibing Ren, Zhijie Zheng, Jiaxuan Guo, Junchi Yan, Lizhuang Ma, Jing Shao
Abstract
In this work, we study the risks of collective financial fraud in large-scale multi-agent systems powered by large language model (LLM) agents. We investigate whether agents can collaborate in fraudulent behaviors, how such collaboration amplifies risks, and what factors influence fraud success. To support this research, we present MultiAgentFinancialFraudBench, a large-scale benchmark for simulating financial fraud scenarios based on realistic online interactions. The benchmark covers 28 typical online fraud scenarios, spanning the full fraud lifecycle across both public and private domains. We further analyze key factors affecting fraud success, including interaction depth, activity level, and fine-grained collaboration failure modes. Finally, we propose a series of mitigation strategies including adding content-level warnings to fraudulent posts and dialogues, using LLMs as monitors to block potentially malicious agents, and fostering group resilience through information sharing at the societal level. Notably, we observe that malicious agents can adapt to environmental interventions. Our findings highlight the real-world risks of multi-agent financial fraud and suggest practical measures for mitigating them. Code is available at https://github.com/zheng977/MutiAgent4Fraud.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0ae5c9a7-0e2a-418e-90cc-a71b80ba4cf3Builds on8
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via SteganographySumeet Ramesh Motwani, Mikhail Baranchuk, Martin Strohmeier, Vijay Bolina et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 140 citations
- Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially FastXiangming Gu, Xiaosen Zheng, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du et al.ICML 2024 · 128 citations
- GPTSwarm: Language Agents as Optimizable GraphsMingchen Zhuge, Wenyi Wang, Louis Kirsch, Francesco Faccio et al.ICML 2024 · 45 citations
- Conning the Crypto Conman: End-to-End Analysis of Cryptocurrency-based Technical Support ScamsBhupendra Acharya, Muhammad Saad, Antonio Emanuele Cinà, Lea Schönherr et al.S&P 2024 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language ModelsZhiyuan Weng, Guikun Chen, Wenguan WangICLR 2025
- EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial StatementsIssa Sugiura, Takashi Ishida, Taro Makino, Chieko Tazuke et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- Are Your Agents Upward Deceivers?Dadi Guo, Qingyu Liu, Dongrui Liu, Qihan Ren et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Learning to Conceal Risk: Controllable Multi-turn Red Teaming for LLMs in the Financial DomainGang Cheng, Haibo Jin, Wenbin Zhang, Haohan Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM SystemsIshan Kavathekar, Hemang Jain, Ameya Rathod, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru et al.ACL 2026 · 16 citations
