Multiply-Robust Causal Change Attribution
Victor Quintas-Martinez, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Eduardo Santiago, Jeff Mu, David Heckerman
Abstract
Comparing two samples of data, we observe a change in the distribution of an outcome variable. In the presence of multiple explanatory variables, how much of the change can be explained by each possible cause? We develop a new estimation strategy that, given a causal model, combines regression and re-weighting methods to quantify the contribution of each causal mechanism. Our proposed methodology is multiply robust, meaning that it still recovers the target parameter under partial misspecification. We prove that our estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. Moreover, it can be incorporated into existing frameworks for causal attribution, such as Shapley values, which will inherit the consistency and large-sample distribution properties. Our method demonstrates excellent performance in Monte Carlo simulations, and we show its usefulness in an empirical application. Our method is implemented as part of the Python library DoWhy (Sharma & Kiciman, 2020; Blöbaum et al., 2022) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a561c1f2-494d-476a-adf6-5f67f8281c59Cited by top-tier papers2
- Unified Covariate Adjustment for Causal InferenceYonghan Jung, Jin Tian, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- "Who experiences large model decay and why?" A Hierarchical Framework for Diagnosing Heterogeneous Performance DriftHarvineet Singh, Fan Xia, Alexej Gossmann, Andrew Chuang et al.ICML 2025
Builds on5
- Causal structure-based root cause analysis of outliersKailash Budhathoki, Lenon Minorics, Patrick Blöbaum, Dominik JanzingICML 2022 · 88 citations
- Approximating the Shapley Value without Marginal ContributionsPatrick Kolpaczki, Viktor Bengs, Maximilian Muschalik, Eyke HüllermeierAAAI 2024 · 43 citations
- Towards Explaining Distribution ShiftsSean Kulinski, David I. InouyeICML 2023 · 38 citations
- On Measuring Causal Contributions via do-interventionsYonghan Jung, Shiva Prasad Kasiviswanathan, Jin Tian, Dominik Janzing et al.ICML 2022 · 36 citations
- Permutation WeightingDavid Arbour, Drew Dimmery, Arjun SondhiICML 2021 · 24 citations
Related papers
- "Why did the Model Fail?": Attributing Model Performance Changes to Distribution ShiftsHaoran Zhang, Harvineet Singh, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shalmali JoshiICML 2023 · 37 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized ExperimentsJinkun Lin, Anqi Zhang, Mathias Lécuyer, Jinyang Li et al.ICML 2022 · 70 citations
- Flow-based Attribution in Graphical Models: A Recursive Shapley ApproachRaghav Singal, George Michailidis, Hoiyi NgICML 2021 · 13 citations
- Collaborative Causal Inference with Fair IncentivesRui Qiao, Xinyi Xu, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICML 2023 · 8 citations
