Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacy
Badih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi
Abstract
In this paper we prove that the sample complexity of properly learning a class of Littlestone dimension d with approximate differential privacy is Õpd 6 q, ignoring privacy and accuracy parameters. This result answers a question of Bun et al. (FOCS 2020) by improving upon their upper bound of 2 Opdq on the sample complexity. Prior to our work, finiteness of the sample complexity for privately learning a class of finite Littlestone dimension was only known for improper private learners, and the fact that our learner is proper answers another question of Bun et al., which was also asked by Bousquet et al. (NeurIPS 2020). Using machinery developed by Bousquet et al., we then show that the sample complexity of sanitizing a binary hypothesis class is at most polynomial in its Littlestone dimension and dual Littlestone dimension. This implies that a class is sanitizable if and only if it has finite Littlestone dimension. An important ingredient of our proofs is a new property of binary hypothesis classes that we call irreducibility, which may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a33588ce-6046-4a42-9e01-efa12242433eCited by top-tier papers18
- User-Level Differentially Private Learning via Correlated SamplingBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online PredictionMark Bun, Roi Livni, Shay MoranFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- Private learning implies quantum stabilityYihui Quek, Srinivasan Arunachalam, John A. SmolinNeurIPS 2021 · 20 citations
- Statistical Indistinguishability of Learning AlgorithmsAlkis Kalavasis, Amin Karbasi, Shay Moran, Grigoris VelegkasICML 2023 · 20 citations
- User-Level Differential Privacy With Few Examples Per UserBadih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
Builds on6
- Differentially Private Clustering: Tight Approximation RatiosBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online PredictionMark Bun, Roi Livni, Shay MoranFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- Private Learning of Halfspaces: Simplifying the Construction and Reducing the Sample ComplexityHaim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri Stemmer, Eliad TsfadiaNeurIPS 2020 · 20 citations
- Synthetic Data Generators - Sequential and PrivateOlivier Bousquet, Roi Livni, Shay MoranNeurIPS 2020 · 13 citations
- A Computational Separation between Private Learning and Online LearningMark BunNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Private Learning of Littlestone Classes, RevisitedXin LyuSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC LearningSatchit Sivakumar, Mark Bun, Marco GaboardiNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Private Online Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: Realizable and Agnostic SettingsBo Li, Wei Wang, Peng YeNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' TheoremSimone Fioravanti, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Hilla Schefler et al.FOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
