Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' Theorem
Simone Fioravanti, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Hilla Schefler, Iska Tsubari
Abstract
This work continues to investigate the link between differentially private (DP) and online learning. Alon, Livni, Malliaris, and Moran [4] showed that for binary concept classes, DP learnability of a given class implies that it has a finite Littlestone dimension (equivalently, that it is online learnable). Their proof relies on a model-theoretic result by Hodges [36], which demonstrates that any binary concept class with a large Littlestone dimension contains a large subclass of thresholds. In a follow-up work, Jung, Kim, and Tewari [38] extended this proof to multiclass PAC learning with a bounded number of labels. Unfortunately, Hodges's result does not apply in other natural settings such as multiclass PAC learning with an unbounded label space, and PAC learning of partial concept classes.
This naturally raises the question of whether DP learnability continues to imply online learnability in more general scenarios: indeed, Alon, Hanneke, Holzman, and Moran [5] explicitly leave it as an open question in the context of partial concept classes, and the same question is open in the general multiclass setting. In this work, we give a positive answer to these questions showing that for general classification tasks, DP learnability implies online learnability. Our proof reasons directly about Littlestone trees, without relying on thresholds. We achieve this by establishing several Ramsey-type theorems for trees, which might be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0d94fa4e-d8cf-48a0-8abc-4fb03f4fb4d2Cited by top-tier papers2
- Borsuk-Ulam and Replicable Learning of Large-Margin HalfspacesAri Blondal, Hamed Hatami, Pooya Hatami, Chavdar Lalov et al.STOC 2026 · 8 citations
- Private Learning of Littlestone Classes, RevisitedXin LyuSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on8
- An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online PredictionMark Bun, Roi Livni, Shay MoranFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary ClassificationYoung Hun Jung, Baekjin Kim, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2020 · 18 citations
- Multiclass Learnability Beyond the PAC Framework: Universal Rates and Partial Concept ClassesAlkis Kalavasis, Grigoris Velegkas, Amin KarbasiNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- A Trichotomy for Transductive Online LearningSteve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Jonathan ShaferNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- A Theory of PAC Learnability of Partial Concept ClassesNoga Alon, Steve Hanneke, Ron Holzman, Shay MoranFOCS 2021 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC LearningSatchit Sivakumar, Mark Bun, Marco GaboardiNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Private Online Learning against an Adaptive Adversary: Realizable and Agnostic SettingsBo Li, Wei Wang, Peng YeNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
- The Limits of Differential Privacy in Online LearningBo Li, Wei Wang, Peng YeNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacyBadih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiSTOC 2021 · 6 citations
