Private Learning of Littlestone Classes, Revisited
Xin Lyu
Abstract
We consider online and PAC learning of Littlestone classes subject to the constraint of approximate differential privacy. Our main result is a private learner to online-learn a Littlestone class with a mistake bound of Õ(d 9.5 • log(T )) in the realizable case, where d denotes the Littlestone dimension and T the time horizon. This is a doubly-exponential improvement over the state-of-the-art [GL21] and comes polynomially close to the lower bound for this task.
The advancement is made possible by a couple of ingredients. The first is a clean and refined interpretation of the "irreducibility" technique from the state-of-the-art private PAC-learner for Littlestone classes [GGKM21]. Our new perspective also allows us to improve the PAC-learner of [GGKM21] and give a sample complexity upper bound of O( d 5 log(1/δβ) εα ) where α and β denote the accuracy and confidence of the PAC learner, respectively. This improves over [GGKM21] by factors of d α and attains an optimal dependence on α. Our algorithm uses a private sparse selection algorithm to sample from a pool of strongly input-dependent candidates. However, unlike most previous uses of sparse selection algorithms, where one only cares about the utility of output, our algorithm requires understanding and manipulating the actual distribution from which an output is drawn. In the proof, we use a sparse version of the Exponential Mechanism from [GKM20], which behaves nicely under our framework and is amenable to a very easy utility proof.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b00350dd-c755-44b5-8ebe-65387daf9760Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Differentially Private Clustering: Tight Approximation RatiosBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual ObservationPalak Jain, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Satchit Sivakumar, Adam D. SmithICML 2023 · 63 citations
- Composition Theorems for Interactive Differential PrivacyXin LyuNeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
- An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online PredictionMark Bun, Roi Livni, Shay MoranFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary ClassificationYoung Hun Jung, Baekjin Kim, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2020 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Littlestone Classes are Privately Online LearnableNoah Golowich, Roi LivniNeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations
- Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC LearningSatchit Sivakumar, Mark Bun, Marco GaboardiNeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations
- Sample-efficient proper PAC learning with approximate differential privacyBadih Ghazi, Noah Golowich, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiSTOC 2021 · 6 citations
- Ramsey Theorems for Trees and a General 'Private Learning Implies Online Learning' TheoremSimone Fioravanti, Steve Hanneke, Shay Moran, Hilla Schefler et al.FOCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private LearningNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyNeurIPS 2020 · 66 citations
