Private learning implies quantum stability
Yihui Quek, Srinivasan Arunachalam, John A. Smolin
Abstract
Learning an unknown n-qubit quantum state ρ is a fundamental challenge in quantum computing. Information-theoretically, it is well-known that tomography requires exponential in n many copies of an unknown state ρ in order to estimate it up to small trace distance. Motivated by computational learning theory, Aaronson and others introduced several (weaker) learning models: the PAC model of learning quantum states (Proc. of Royal Society A'07), shadow tomography (STOC'18) for learning "shadows" of a quantum state, a learning model that additionally requires learners to be differentially private (STOC'19), and the online model of learning quantum states (NeurIPS'18). In these models it was shown that an unknown quantum state can be learned "approximately well" using linear in n many copies of ρ. But is there any relationship between these learning models? In this paper we prove a sequence of (information-theoretic) implications from differentially-private PAC learning to online learning and then to quantum stability. Our main result generalizes the recent work of Bun, Livni and Moran (Journal of the ACM, 2021) who showed that finite Littlestone dimension (of Boolean-valued concept classes) implies PAC learnability in the (approximate) differentially private (DP) setting. We first consider their work in the real-valued setting and further extend to their techniques to the setting of learning quantum states. Key to many of our results is our construction of a generic quantum online learner, Robust Standard Optimal Algorithm (RSOA), which is robust to adversarial imprecision. We then show information-theoretic implications between DP learning quantum states in the PAC model, learnability of quantum states in the one-way communication model, online learning of quantum states, quantum stability (which is our new conceptual contribution) and various combinatorial parameters. As an application, we also improve gentle shadow tomography (for classes of quantum states) and show connections between noisy quantum state learning and channel capacity, which might be relevant to physically-motivated learning scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 998c73f5-c4f7-4b6c-ae56-a38137378fa1Builds on6
- Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private LearningNika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek ShettyNeurIPS 2020 · 66 citations
- Improved Quantum data analysisCostin Badescu, Ryan O'DonnellSTOC 2021 · 40 citations
- An Equivalence Between Private Classification and Online PredictionMark Bun, Roi Livni, Shay MoranFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- On the Equivalence between Online and Private Learnability beyond Binary ClassificationYoung Hun Jung, Baekjin Kim, Ambuj TewariNeurIPS 2020 · 18 citations
- A Computational Separation between Private Learning and Online LearningMark BunNeurIPS 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Learning Distributions over Quantum Measurement OutcomesWeiyuan Gong, Scott AaronsonICML 2023 · 13 citations
- Dimension Independent and Computationally Efficient Shadow TomographyPulkit SinhaSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Learning of Pure States is as Hard as Mixed StatesMaxime Meyer, Soumik Adhikary, Naixu Guo, Patrick RebentrostNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- On the Role of Entanglement and Statistics in LearningSrinivasan Arunachalam, Vojtech Havlícek, Louis SchatzkiNeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
- Learning the Closest Product StateAinesh Bakshi, John Bostanci, William Kretschmer, Zeph Landau et al.STOC 2025 · 1 citation
