USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
Shattered Chain of Trust: Understanding Security Risks in Cross-Cloud IoT Access Delegation
Bin Yuan, Yan Jia, Luyi Xing, Dongfang Zhao, XiaoFeng Wang, Deqing Zou, Hai Jin, Yuqing Zhang
Abstract
IoT clouds facilitate the communication between IoT devices and users, and authorize users' access to their devices. In this paradigm, an IoT device is usually managed under a particular IoT cloud designated by the device vendor, e.g., Philips bulbs are managed under Philips Hue cloud. Today's mainstream IoT clouds also support device access delegation across different vendors (e.g., Philips Hue, LIFX, etc.) and cloud providers (e.g., Google, IFTTT, etc.): for example, Philips Hue and SmartThings clouds support to delegate device access to another cloud such as Google Home, so a user can manage multiple devices from different vendors all through Google Home. Serving this purpose are the IoT delegation mechanisms developed and utilized by IoT clouds, which we found are heterogeneous and ad-hoc in the wild, in the absence of a standardized delegation protocol suited for IoT environments. In this paper, we report the first systematic study on real-world IoT access delegation, based upon a semi-automatic verification tool we developed. Our study brought to light the pervasiveness of security risks in these delegation mechanisms, allowing the adversary (e.g., Airbnb tenants, former employees) to gain unauthorized access to the victim's devices (e.g., smart locks) or impersonate the devices to trigger other devices. We confirmed the presence of critical security flaws in these mechanisms through end-to-end exploits on them, and further conducted a measurement study. Our research demonstrates the serious consequences of these exploits and the security implications of the practice today for building these mechanisms. We reported our findings to related parties, which acknowledged the problems. We further propose principles for developing more secure cross-cloud IoT delegation services, before a standardized solution can be widely deployed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a0f7d7df-d021-4346-8b0c-78f5a2d24577Cited by top-tier papers10
- Who's In Control? On Security Risks of Disjointed IoT Device Management ChannelsYan Jia, Bin Yuan, Luyi Xing, Dongfang Zhao et al.CCS 2021 · 22 citations
- P-Verifier: Understanding and Mitigating Security Risks in Cloud-based IoT Access PoliciesZe Jin, Luyi Xing, Yiwei Fang, Yan Jia et al.CCS 2022 · 19 citations
- Ruledger: Ensuring Execution Integrity in Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsJingwen Fan, Yi He, Bo Tang, Qi Li et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 17 citations
- Securing Graph Neural Networks in MLaaS: A Comprehensive Realization of Query-based Integrity VerificationBang Wu, Xingliang Yuan, Shuo Wang, Qi Li et al.S&P 2024 · 13 citations
- Perils and Mitigation of Security Risks of Cooperation in Mobile-as-a-Gateway IoTXin'an Zhou, Jiale Guan, Luyi Xing, Zhiyun QianCCS 2022 · 9 citations
Builds on14
- Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home ApplicationsEarlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashS&P 2016 · 684 citations
- ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT PlatformsYunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati et al.NDSS 2017 · 325 citations
- FlowFence: Practical Data Protection for Emerging IoT Application FrameworksEarlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 296 citations
- IoTGuard: Dynamic Enforcement of Security and Safety Policy in Commodity IoTZ. Berkay Celik, Gang Tan, Patrick D. McDanielNDSS 2019 · 254 citations
- Sensitive Information Tracking in Commodity IoTZ. Berkay Celik, Leonardo Babun, Amit Kumar Sikder, Hidayet Aksu et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 236 citations
Related papers
- Burglars' IoT Paradise: Understanding and Mitigating Security Risks of General Messaging Protocols on IoT CloudsYan Jia, Luyi Xing, Yuhang Mao, Dongfang Zhao et al.S&P 2020 · 64 citations
- Protected or Porous: A Comparative Analysis of Threat Detection Capability of IoT SafeguardsAnna Maria Mandalari, Hamed Haddadi, Daniel J. Dubois, David R. ChoffnesS&P 2023
- Discovering and Understanding the Security Hazards in the Interactions between IoT Devices, Mobile Apps, and Clouds on Smart Home PlatformsWei Zhou, Yan Jia, Yao Yao, Lipeng Zhu et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 160 citations
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 205 citations
- Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access ControlMadiha Tabassum, Jess Kropczynski, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heather Richter LipfordCHI 2020 · 45 citations
