Privacy Amplification for Matrix Mechanisms
Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta
Abstract
Privacy amplification exploits randomness in data selection to provide tighter differential privacy (DP) guarantees. This analysis is key to DP-SGD's success in machine learning (ML), but, is not readily applicable to the newer state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms. This is because these algorithms, known as DP-FTRL, use the matrix mechanism to add correlated noise instead of independent noise as in DP-SGD. In this paper, we propose "MMCC", the first algorithm to analyze privacy amplification via sampling for any generic matrix mechanism. MMCC is nearly tight in that it approaches a lower bound as ε → 0. To analyze correlated outputs in MMCC, we prove that they can be analyzed as if they were independent, by conditioning them on prior outputs. Our "conditional composition theorem" has broad utility: we use it to show that the noise added to binary-tree-DP-FTRL can asymptotically match the noise added to DP-SGD with amplification. Our amplification algorithm also has practical empirical utility: we show it leads to significant improvement in the privacy-utility trade-offs for DP-FTRL algorithms on standard benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language ModelsAshwinee Panda, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Zhengming Zhang, Yaoqing Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 41 citations
- Preserving Node-level Privacy in Graph Neural NetworksZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Di WangS&P 2024 · 28 citations
- Banded Square Root Matrix Factorization for Differentially Private Model TrainingNikita P. Kalinin, Christoph H. LampertNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- Privacy amplification by random allocationMoshe Shenfeld, Vitaly FeldmanNeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- Back to Square Roots: An Optimal Bound on the Matrix Factorization Error for Multi-Epoch Differentially Private SGDNikita Kalinin, Ryan McKenna, Jalaj Upadhyay, Christoph H. LampertICLR 2026 · 10 citations
Builds on8
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Practical and Private (Deep) Learning Without Sampling or ShufflingPeter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar et al.ICML 2021 · 239 citations
- Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive StreamsSergey Denisov, H. Brendan McMahan, John Rush, Adam D. Smith et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 96 citations
- Privacy Amplification via Random Check-InsBorja Balle, Peter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Om Dipakbhai Thakkar et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 86 citations
- Hiding Among the Clones: A Simple and Nearly Optimal Analysis of Privacy Amplification by ShufflingVitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Kunal TalwarFOCS 2021 · 76 citations
Related papers
- Gradient Descent with Linearly Correlated Noise: Theory and Applications to Differential PrivacyAnastasia Koloskova, Ryan McKenna, Zachary Charles, John Keith Rush et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix MechanismsChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Saminul Haque, Thomas Steinke et al.ICLR 2025
- Correlated Noise Provably Beats Independent Noise for Differentially Private LearningChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Krishna Pillutla, Arun Ganesh et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- (Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private trainingChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Ryan McKenna, H. Brendan McMahan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 67 citations
- Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationJan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
