Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language Models
Ashwinee Panda, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Zhengming Zhang, Yaoqing Yang, Prateek Mittal
Abstract
When large language models are trained on private data, it can be a significant privacy risk for them to memorize and regurgitate sensitive information. In this work, we propose a new practical data extraction attack that we call "neural phishing". This attack enables an adversary to target and extract sensitive or personally identifiable information (PII), e.g., credit card numbers, from a model trained on user data with upwards of 10% attack success rates, at times, as high as 50%. Our attack assumes only that an adversary can insert as few as 10s of benign-appearing sentences into the training dataset using only vague priors on the structure of the user data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fc4d9c95-7dbb-43fa-b461-161bff465584Cited by top-tier papers12
- LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language ModelsQinbin Li, Junyuan Hong, Chulin Xie, Jeffrey Tan et al.VLDB 2024 · 66 citations
- AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational AgentsEugene Bagdasarian, Ren Yi, Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Peter Kairouz et al.CCS 2024 · 5 citations
- PromptCOS: Towards Content-Only System Prompt Copyright Auditing for LLMsYuchen Yang, Yiming Li, Hongwei Yao, Enhao Huang et al.S&P 2026 · 5 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Verbatim Memorization in LLM PrivacyTom Sander, Bargav Jayaraman, Mark Ibrahim, Kamalika Chaudhuri et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- CapBencher: Give Your LLM Benchmark a Built-in Alarm for Test-Set OverfittingTakashi Ishida, Thanawat Lodkaew, Ikko YamaneICML 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on30
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
Related papers
- Private Investigator: Extracting Personally Identifiable Information from Large Language Models Using Optimized PromptsSeongho Keum, Dongwon Shin, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Panning for Gold in Federated Learning: Targeted Text Extraction under Arbitrarily Large-Scale AggregationHong-Min Chu, Jonas Geiping, Liam H. Fowl, Micah Goldblum et al.ICLR 2023
- Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language ModelsElena Sofia Ruzzetti, Giancarlo A. Xompero, Davide Venditti, Fabio Massimo ZanzottoACL 2025 · 9 citations
- Effective PII Extraction from LLMs through Augmented Few-Shot LearningShuai Cheng, Shu Meng, Haitao Xu, Haoran Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Exploiting the Shadows: Unveiling Privacy Leaks through Lower-Ranked Tokens in Large Language ModelsYuan Zhou, Zhuo Zhang, Xiangyu ZhangACL 2025 · 2 citations
