USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
Effective PII Extraction from LLMs through Augmented Few-Shot Learning
Shuai Cheng, Shu Meng, Haitao Xu, Haoran Zhang, Shuai Hao, Chuan Yue, Wenrui Ma, Meng Han, Fan Zhang, Zhao Li
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong natural language processing capabilities but also pose significant privacy risks, particularly regarding the leakage of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) embedded in their training data. Existing PII extraction methods suffer from the limitations of low success rates or impracticality for large-scale PII extraction. In this study, we propose a novel PII extraction approach based on enhanced few-shot learning techniques, which achieves efficient and cost-effective PII retrieval without relying on fine-tuning or jailbreaking. We evaluated our approach on both open-source and closed-source LLMs. The experimental results demonstrate that, for non-targeted PII extraction, the attack success rate reaches 48.9%, extracting one authentic PII per two queries at a cost of $0.012 per PII. For targeted PII extraction, our approach surpassed state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 10% to 60% improvement in attack success rates. Additionally, an exploratory analysis of the origins of extracted PII revealed the significant scale of potential privacy breaches. Our work advances the understanding of LLM-induced privacy risks and underscores the vulnerability of partial personal data to large-scale exploitation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 17fe5d25-54fe-44d4-9ab8-1d99548d5990Cited by top-tier papers3
- Reverse-Engineering Model Editing on Language ModelsZhiyu Sun, Minrui Luo, Yu Wang, Zhili Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- The Privacy Paradox of LLMs: User Perceptions and the Reality of PII LeakageShuai Cheng, Haitao Xu, Shu Meng, Shuai Hao et al.CHI 2026
- The Tragedy of Convenience: Cascading User-Data Leakage from SMS-delivered URLsMuhammad Danish, Enrique Sobrados, Priya Kaushik, Bhupendra Acharya et al.CCS 2026
Builds on21
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language ModelsXiaogeng Liu, Nan Xu, Muhao Chen, Chaowei XiaoICLR 2024 · 722 citations
- Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language ModelsDa Yu, Saurabh Naik, Arturs Backurs, Sivakanth Gopi et al.ICLR 2022 · 494 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language ModelsNikhil Kandpal, Eric Wallace, Colin RaffelICML 2022 · 395 citations
Related papers
- Exploiting the Shadows: Unveiling Privacy Leaks through Lower-Ranked Tokens in Large Language ModelsYuan Zhou, Zhuo Zhang, Xiangyu ZhangACL 2025 · 2 citations
- PIG: Privacy Jailbreak Attack on LLMs via Gradient-based Iterative In-Context OptimizationYidan Wang, Yanan Cao, Yubing Ren, Fang Fang et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Investigating How Pre-training Data Leakage Affects Models' Reproduction and Detection CapabilitiesMasahiro Kaneko, Timothy BaldwinEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Teach LLMs to Phish: Stealing Private Information from Language ModelsAshwinee Panda, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Zhengming Zhang, Yaoqing Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 41 citations
- Private Investigator: Extracting Personally Identifiable Information from Large Language Models Using Optimized PromptsSeongho Keum, Dongwon Shin, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong et al.USENIX Security 2025
