Rethinking the Role of Verbatim Memorization in LLM Privacy
Tom Sander, Bargav Jayaraman, Mark Ibrahim, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Chuan Guo
Abstract
Conventional wisdom in machine learning privacy research states that memorization directly implies a loss of privacy. In contrast, a well-generalized model only remembers distributional patterns and preserves privacy of its training data. In this work, we show that this relationship is much more complex for LLMs trained for chat, and depends heavily on how knowledge is encoded and manipulated. To this end, we fine-tune language models on synthetically generated biographical information including PIIs, and try to extract them in different ways after instruction fine-tuning. We find counter to conventional wisdom that better verbatim memorization does not necessarily increase data leakage via chat. We also find that it is easier to extract information via chat from an LLM that is better able to manipulate and process knowledge even if it is smaller, and that not all attributes are equally extractable. This suggests that the relationship between privacy, memo-rization and language understanding of LLMs is very intricate, and that examining memorization in isolation can lead to misleading conclusions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b02eb622-f88c-41af-81bb-c8ed31c1799bBuilds on18
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in PracticeBargav Jayaraman, David EvansUSENIX Security 2019 · 586 citations
Related papers
- Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language ModelsElena Sofia Ruzzetti, Giancarlo A. Xompero, Davide Venditti, Fabio Massimo ZanzottoACL 2025 · 9 citations
- Extracting Training Data From Document-Based VQA ModelsFrancesco Pinto, Nathalie Rauschmayr, Florian Tramèr, Philip Torr et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Daphne Ippolito, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 158 citations
- Exploring Memorization in Fine-tuned Language ModelsShenglai Zeng, Yaxin Li, Jie Ren, Yiding Liu et al.ACL 2024
- Generated Data with Fake Privacy: Hidden Dangers of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Generated DataAtilla Akkus, Masoud Poorghaffar Aghdam, Mingjie Li, Junjie Chu et al.USENIX Security 2025
