Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification
Jan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan Günnemann
Abstract
Amplification by subsampling is one of the main primitives in machine learning with differential privacy (DP): Training a model on random batches instead of complete datasets results in stronger privacy. This is traditionally formalized via mechanism-agnostic subsampling guarantees that express the privacy parameters of a subsampled mechanism as a function of the original mechanism's privacy parameters. We propose the first general framework for deriving mechanism-specific guarantees, which leverage additional information beyond these parameters to more tightly characterize the subsampled mechanism's privacy. Such guarantees are of particular importance for privacy accounting, i.e., tracking privacy over multiple iterations. Overall, our framework based on conditional optimal transport lets us derive existing and novel guarantees for approximate DP, accounting with Rényi DP, and accounting with dominating pairs in a unified, principled manner. As an application, we analyze how subsampling affects the privacy of groups of multiple users. Our tight mechanism-specific bounds outperform tight mechanism-agnostic bounds and classic group privacy results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0ec8c2bf-bb54-43e3-b6c9-c29f15574679Cited by top-tier papers5
- Calibrating Noise for Group Privacy in Subsampled MechanismsYangfan Jiang, Xinjian Luo, Yin Yang, Xiaokui XiaoVLDB 2025 · 6 citations
- Convergent Privacy Framework for Multi-layer GNNs through Contractive Message PassingYu Zheng, Chenang Li, Zhou Li, Qingsong WangNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Differentially Private Relational Learning with Entity-level Privacy GuaranteesYinan Huang, Haoteng Yin, Eli Chien, Rongzhe Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix MechanismsChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Saminul Haque, Thomas Steinke et al.ICLR 2025
- Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series ForecastingJan Schuchardt, Mina Dalirrooyfard, Jed Guzelkabaagac, Anderson Schneider et al.ICML 2025
Builds on24
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Numerical Composition of Differential PrivacySivakanth Gopi, Yin Tat Lee, Lukas WutschitzNeurIPS 2021 · 259 citations
- Robustness Certificates for Sparse Adversarial Attacks by Randomized AblationAlexander Levine, Soheil FeiziAAAI 2020 · 114 citations
- Efficient Robustness Certificates for Discrete Data: Sparsity-Aware Randomized Smoothing for Graphs, Images and MoreAleksandar Bojchevski, Johannes Klicpera, Stephan GünnemannICML 2020 · 95 citations
Related papers
- Renyi Differential Privacy of The Subsampled Shuffle Model In Distributed LearningAntonious M. Girgis, Deepesh Data, Suhas N. DiggaviNeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
- Bayesian Differential Privacy for Machine LearningAleksei Triastcyn, Boi FaltingsICML 2020 · 79 citations
- Wasserstein Differential PrivacyChengyi Yang, Jiayin Qi, Aimin ZhouAAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Shifted Interpolation for Differential PrivacyJinho Bok, Weijie J. Su, Jason M. AltschulerICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy LossJason M. Altschuler, Kunal TalwarNeurIPS 2022 · 89 citations
