Calibrating Noise for Group Privacy in Subsampled Mechanisms
Yangfan Jiang, Xinjian Luo, Yin Yang, Xiaokui Xiao
Abstract
Given a group size m and a sensitive dataset D , group privacy (GP) releases information about D (e.g., weights of a neural network trained on D) with the guarantee that the adversary cannot infer with high confidence whether the underlying data is D or a neighboring dataset D ′ that differs from D by m records. GP generalizes the well-established notion of differential privacy (DP) for protecting individuals' privacy; in particular, when m = 1, GP reduces to DP. Compared to DP, GP is capable of protecting the sensitive aggregate information of a group of up to m individuals, e.g., the average annual income among members of a yacht club. Despite its longstanding presence in the research literature and its promising applications, GP is often treated as an afterthought, with most approaches first developing a differential privacy (DP) mechanism and then using a generic conversion to adapt it for GP, treating the DP solution as a black box. As we point out in the paper, this methodology is suboptimal when the underlying DP solution involves subsampling, e.g., in the classic DP-SGD method for training deep learning models. In this case, the DP-to-GP conversion is overly pessimistic in its analysis, leading to high error and low utility in the published results under GP.
Motivated by this, we propose a novel analysis framework that provides tight privacy accounting for subsampled GP mechanisms. Instead of converting a black-box DP mechanism to GP, our solution carefully analyzes and utilizes the inherent randomness in subsampled mechanisms, leading to a substantially improved bound on the privacy loss with respect to GP. The proposed solution applies to a wide variety of foundational mechanisms with subsampling. Extensive experiments with real datasets demonstrate that compared to the baseline convert-from-blackbox-DP approach, our GP mechanisms achieve noise reductions of over an order of magnitude in several practical settings, including deep neural network training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e1ed7d19-9522-473e-bbe1-3c5c155a159bCited by top-tier papers5
- Differentially Private Relational Learning with Entity-level Privacy GuaranteesYinan Huang, Haoteng Yin, Eli Chien, Rongzhe Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025
- The Adverse Effects of Omitting Records in Differential Privacy: How Sampling and Suppression Degrade the Privacy–Utility TradeoffÀlex Miranda-Pascual, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten StrufeUSENIX Security 2026
- DP-S4S: Accurate and Scalable Select-Join-Aggregate Query Processing with User-Level Differential PrivacyYuan Qiu, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin YangSIGMOD 2026
- Privacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series ForecastingJan Schuchardt, Mina Dalirrooyfard, Jed Guzelkabaagac, Anderson Schneider et al.ICML 2025
- Prompt Inference Attack on Distributed Large Language Model Inference FrameworksXinjian Luo, Ting Yu, Xiaokui XiaoCCS 2025
Builds on21
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
- The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated LearningNaman Agarwal, Peter Kairouz, Ziyu LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 161 citations
Related papers
- Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationJan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance SamplingJianxin Wei, Ergute Bao, Xiaokui Xiao, Yin YangCCS 2022 · 16 citations
- Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine LearningMilad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot et al.S&P 2021 · 288 citations
- GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation PerturbationSina Sajadmanesh, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Aurélien Bellet, Daniel Gatica-PerezUSENIX Security 2023
- Differentially Private Model Publishing for Deep LearningLei Yu, Ling Liu, Calton Pu, Mehmet Emre Gursoy et al.S&P 2019 · 294 citations
